Literature DB >> 8740507

Evaluation of the CLINITEK ATLAS for routine macroscopic urinalysis.

V C Dias1, T Moschopedis, C Prosser, R W Yatscoff.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of a new, benchtop, fully automated urine analyzer the CLINITEK ATLAS and compare it with the URICHEM 1000 CHEMSTRIP UA analyzer. Macroscopic analysis included measurement of 8 urine analyte chemistries and specific gravity by the refractive index method (SgRl).
METHODS: The analytical performance studies conducted were calibration stability, precision (within-run and day-to-day), comparison of results of 437 fresh patient urine specimens, analysis of time performance, and problem logging over a 16-day evaluation period.
RESULTS: Satisfactory calibration reproducibility, within-run (n = 10), and day-to-day (n = 16) precision was found because results fell within the +/- one color-block by the proposed National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) criteria. Patient results (n = 437) from the 2 analyzers giving the same color-block agreement was found to be for pH, 52%; glucose, 92%; ketones, 86%; protein, 79%; bilirubin, 97%; leukocytes, 72%; blood, 80%; and nitrite, 98%. The concordance defined by the NCCLS criteria as the agreement of results +/- one color-block between the 2 analyzers was found to be for pH, 96%; glucose, 99%; ketones, 100%; protein, 95%; bilirubin, 100%; leukocytes, 97%; and blood 86%. The SgRl determined on ATLAS was correlated with the RD-10 Rapid Density analyzer with the following results: slope = 0.97, intercept = 0.033, r = 0.94, Syx = 0.003, for a range of values from 1.002 to 1.070.
CONCLUSION: Our preliminary data indicate that the analytical performance, and automatable features for complete walk-away function of this analyzer can significantly increase the overall testing efficiency in the urinalysis laboratory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8740507     DOI: 10.1016/0009-9120(96)84727-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biochem        ISSN: 0009-9120            Impact factor:   3.281


  4 in total

1.  Clinical laboratory automated urinalysis: comparison among automated microscopy, flow cytometry, two test strips analyzers, and manual microscopic examination of the urine sediments.

Authors:  S Mayo; D Acevedo; C Quiñones-Torrelo; I Canós; M Sancho
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  Analytical performance, agreement and user-friendliness of six point-of-care testing urine analysers for urinary tract infection in general practice.

Authors:  Marjolein J C Schot; Sanne van Delft; Antoinette M J Kooijman-Buiting; Niek J de Wit; Rogier M Hopstaken
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Prospective, observational study comparing automated and visual point-of-care urinalysis in general practice.

Authors:  Sanne van Delft; Annelijn Goedhart; Mark Spigt; Bart van Pinxteren; Niek de Wit; Rogier Hopstaken
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Diaper-embedded urine test device for the screening of urinary tract infections in children: a cohort study.

Authors:  Niko Paalanne; Lotta Wikstedt; Tytti Pokka; Jarmo Salo; Matti Uhari; Marjo Renko; Terhi Tapiainen
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 2.125

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.