Literature DB >> 8740394

Treatment with the Reliance urinary control insert: one-year experience.

J L Miller1, T Bavendam.   

Abstract

The 1-year experience of 63 women using an intraurethral insert for the management of stress or mild mixed urinary incontinence is presented, emphasizing safety and efficacy. Objective criteria, including standardized pad weight tests and patient diaries, were employed to evaluate the device's effectiveness. At study outset, 82% of the patients were completely dry with the device in situ, with an additional 16% of patients significantly improved. At 12 months, 79% of the patients were completely dry, and 16% were significantly improved. This result is consistent with the significant improvement (P < 0.0001) in the number of urinary incontinence episodes reported in patient diaries. Women reported that the device significantly improved their ability to stay dry over a number of routine and physically demanding daily activities. The device was increasingly easy to use and more comfortable over time (P < 0.0001). The latter finding was confirmed by a decline in patient reports of "sensation of device presence" over the duration of the study (35% at 1 week v 7% at 12 months). Untoward events included gross hematuria (24%), device-related bladder mucosal irritation (9%), and symptomatic bacteriuria (30%). Such side effects were expected for this type of device, were easily managed without significant medical intervention, and did not result in any long-term clinical sequelae. The great reduction in the number of episodes of urinary incontinence, the low rate of significant problems associated with device use, and ease of use make the intraurethral insert a useful management alternative for women with stress urinary incontinence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8740394     DOI: 10.1089/end.1996.10.287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  4 in total

Review 1.  Clinical usefulness of urinary control urethral insert devices.

Authors:  J M Choe; D R Staskin
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1997

2.  Clinical use of the FemAssist device in female urinary incontinence.

Authors:  J M Rabin
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  A randomized controlled trial of the NEAT expandable tip continence device.

Authors:  H Robinson; J Schulz; C Flood; L Hansen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2003-07-09

4.  PDMS and DLC-coated unidirectional valves for artificial urinary sphincters: Opening performance after 126 days of immersion in urine.

Authors:  Tommaso Mazzocchi; Gioia Lucarini; Irene Roehrer; Arianna Menciassi; Leonardo Ricotti
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 3.405

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.