Literature DB >> 8740029

Prognostic factors of primary transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract.

S H Lee1, J S Lin, T S Tzai, N H Chow, Y C Tong, W H Yang, C C Chang, H L Cheng.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We presented and analyzed our results in order to determine the relationship between patient survival and tumor grade and/or stage. In addition, a retrospective tumor DNA ploidy study was done to evaluate its possible role in predicting future tumor recurrence in the bladder.
METHODS: A total of 112 patients with upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinomas (TCCs) were recorded at our hospital. Of these, 68 patients without concurrent bladder tumors (ages ranged from 36 to 80, mean 62.4 years; male:female = 1:1.2) were treated by nephroureterectomy and bladder cuff resection. They were followed up for 14-79 months (average 38.2 months). Eight (36.4%) of the 22 patients who had stage C or D tumors had received adjuvant systemic methotrexate, vinblastine, epirubicin, cisplatin chemotherapy after surgery. DNA flow cytometry using paraffin-blocked tumor specimens was performed on the tumors of 52 patients.
RESULTS: Their pathologic stages and grades were 11 at stage 0, 15 at stage A, 20 at stage B, 14 at stage C, 8 at stage D; 9 of grade I, 41 of grade II, and 18 of grade III. Postoperatively, 13 patients (19.1%) subsequently developed bladder tumors with a latent period ranging from 2 to 37 months (average 14.9 months). The difference of the tumor DNA ploidy distribution pattern among tumors of high versus low stages and/or grades is not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Overall, the 5-year survival rates for patients with low- and high-stage tumors were 100 and 66.7%, respectively; for patients with grade I-II and III tumors they were 93.6 and 28.3%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient survival was mainly related to both tumor stages (p = 0.0037) and grades (p = 0.0001), rather than to tumor DNA ploidy. For patients with grade II upper urinary tract tumors, tumor DNA ploidy seems to provide no additional predictive value on subsequent tumor recurrence in the bladder.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8740029     DOI: 10.1159/000473758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  6 in total

1.  Prognostic factors for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas: stage, grade, and smoking status.

Authors:  Adnan Simsir; Banu Sarsik; Ibrahim Cureklibatir; Sait Sen; Gurhan Gunaydin; Cag Cal
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  Bladder tumor markers: need, nature and application. 1. Nucleus-based markers.

Authors:  M M Kirollos; S McDermott; R A Bradbrook
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1998

3.  Transitional cell carcinoma in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Yu-Lin Kao; Yen-Chuan Ou; Chi-Rei Yang; Hao-Chung Ho; Chung-Kuang Su; Kuo-Hsiung Shu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-06-06       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Patterns of invasion and histological growth as prognostic indicators in urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract.

Authors:  C Langner; G Hutterer; T Chromecki; P Rehak; R Zigeuner
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Prognostic factors in transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract after radical nephroureterectomy.

Authors:  Dae Sung Cho; Seok Young Hong; Young Kyun Kim; Sun Il Kim; Se Joong Kim
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2011-05-24

6.  Molecular grading of tumors of the upper urothelial tract using FGFR3 mutation status identifies patients with favorable prognosis.

Authors:  Stephen R Lyle; Chung-Cheng Hsieh; Cecilia A Fernandez; Anthony P Shuber
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2012-12-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.