Literature DB >> 8739874

Assessment of patient's benefit from rhinoplasty.

E J Stewart1, K Robinson, J A Wilson.   

Abstract

It is standard practice for most rhinoplasty surgeons to assess what they perceive to be the cosmetic outcome of their surgery. There have, however, been few attempts to gauge the degree of success of rhinoplasty from the patient's perspective. The aim of this study was to measure the benefit of rhinoplasty in an unselected group of patients who had undergone this procedure under the National Health Service (NHS). Two hundred and twenty-four patients who had undergone rhinoplasty or septorhinoplasty in the Department of Otolaryngology at Glasgow Royal Infirmary from 1990 to 1994 were surveyed by post; two questionnaires were administered. The Glasgow Benefit Inventory has four subscales which assess the patient's perception of the success of surgery, and the influence of surgery on the patients physical health, psychosocial function and social interaction. The Nasal Symptom Questionnaire (Fairley et al., 1993)--previously validated as an outcome measure in the context of FESS--was used to assess nasal symptoms. Multivariate and factor analysis was used to analyse the results. Four factors were extracted from the 103 responses to the Glasgow Benefit Inventory. The major factor of the benefit score was perception of surgical success which explained 50% of the variance. Three other factors (improvements in psychosocial functioning, social interaction and physical health after surgery) accounted for 10%, 5%, and 6% of the variance, respectively. Analysis of the Nasal Symptom Questionnaire yielded one predominant factor which was inversely related to perceived benefit. The outcome of rhinoplasty is influenced by the presence of nasal symptoms. Greater attention to nasal function would increase the benefit of rhinoplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8739874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rhinology        ISSN: 0300-0729            Impact factor:   3.681


  7 in total

1.  Assessing the rhinoplasty outcome: inter-rater variability of aesthetic perception in the light of objective facial analysis.

Authors:  Kerem Ozturk; Sercan Gode; Ceyda Karahan; Rasit Midilli
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  A prediction modeling based on SNOT-22 score for endoscopic nasal septoplasty: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Xue-Ran Kang; Bin Chen; Yi-Sheng Chen; Bin Yi; Xiaojun Yan; Chenyan Jiang; Shulun Wang; Lixing Lu; Runjie Shi
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Risks and complications in rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Gerhard Rettinger
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-03-14

4.  Quality of life before and after septoplasty and rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Ingo Baumann
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-04-27

5.  Assessment of Septoplasty Effectiveness using Acoustic Rhinometry and Rhinomanometry.

Authors:  Mohammad Hossein Dadgarnia; Mohammad Hossein Baradaranfar; Mona Mazidi; Seyed Mohammad Reza Azimi Meibodi
Journal:  Iran J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013

Review 6.  The Glasgow Benefit Inventory: a systematic review of the use and value of an otorhinolaryngological generic patient-recorded outcome measure.

Authors:  J Hendry; A Chin; I R C Swan; M A Akeroyd; G G Browning
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-07       Impact factor: 2.597

7.  Difficult septal deviation cases: open or closed technique?

Authors:  Sultan Şevik Eliçora; Duygu Erdem; Hüseyin Işık; Murat Damar; Aykut Erdem Dinç
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-04-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.