Literature DB >> 8739677

Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope microperimetry compared with Octopus perimetry in normal subjects.

M V Andersen1.   

Abstract

Simultaneously performed ophthalmoscopy and perimetry by microperimetry using the Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope eliminates some of the classical problems involved in transformation techniques in perimetry such as: optical distortions, unsteady fixation and alignment. Almost all reports published on microperimetry have addressed chorioretinal diseases, with only a few patients in each study. No reports have studied the normal values of this method. To evaluate the reliability of microperimetry, 30 healthy subjects-10 subjects from each of the age group: 40-49 years (male/female ratio: 4/6), 50-59 years (m/f ratio: 5/5) and 60-69 years (m/f ratio: 5/5)-were repeatedly examined with microperimetry and automatic perimetry performed by the Octopus macular program M1. The results of the present study of microperimetry show that the standard deviation of the interindividual variance component was 1.36, that the standard deviation of the intraindividual variance component was 0.94 and that a test result obtained by microperimetry in any of the two locations studied can be related to a test result obtained by Octopus M1 in the same location.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8739677     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.1996.tb00057.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand        ISSN: 1395-3907


  4 in total

1.  [Fundus perimetry in functional diagnostics of glaucoma. Applicable in the practice?].

Authors:  K Rohrschneider; P C Issa; C Springer; A F Scheuerle
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Fixation Stability Measurement Using Two Types of Microperimetry Devices.

Authors:  Hongting Liu; Millena G Bittencourt; Raafay Sophie; Yasir J Sepah; Mostafa Hanout; Zubir Rentiya; Rachel Annam; Hendrik P N Scholl; Quan Dong Nguyen
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.283

3.  Assessment of Central Retinal Sensitivity Employing Two Types of Microperimetry Devices.

Authors:  Hongting Liu; Millena G Bittencourt; Jiangxia Wang; Raafay Sophie; Rachel Annam; Mohamed A Ibrahim; Yasir J Sepah; Ahmadreza Moradi; Hendrik P N Scholl; Quan Dong Nguyen
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.283

4.  Individual Test Point Fluctuations of Macular Sensitivity in Healthy Eyes and Eyes With Age-Related Macular Degeneration Measured With Microperimetry.

Authors:  Mirella Telles Salgueiro Barboni; Zsuzsanna Szepessy; Dora Fix Ventura; János Németh
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 3.283

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.