Literature DB >> 8738616

A case in favour of one sided microscopic vasovasostomy--the New Delhi experience.

I Singh1, R C Kaza.   

Abstract

Between January 1987 and December 1991 we performed vasovasal anastomosis in 60 patients who had undergone vasectomy for family planning. Of these, 30 patients were randomized for microscopic vasovasostomy and the remaining 30 patients had a macroscopic vasovasal anastomosis. Without exception the procedures were performed on one side only. Out of the 50 patients who reported for follow-up, 44 had return of spermatozoa upon semen analysis. Pregnancy resulted in 30 out of 40 patients who attempted conception (average 75%). There was one complication but no case of surgical trauma- or anaesthesia-related mishap was encountered. The results of the micro and the macro groups are analysed separately in order to draw conclusions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8738616     DOI: 10.1007/bf02550134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  11 in total

Review 1.  Urologic microsurgery--current perspectives: I. Vasovasostomy.

Authors:  A M Belker
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Vasectomy reversal.

Authors:  R D Amelar; L Dubin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  A 20-year experience with vasovasostomy.

Authors:  H Y Lee
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Microscopic vasovasostomy and spermatogenesis.

Authors:  S J Silber; J Galle; D Friend
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  Vasovasostomy: current state of the art.

Authors:  L R Cos; J R Valvo; R S Davis; A T Cockett
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Microspike approximator for vasovasostomy.

Authors:  M Goldstein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Simplified technique for microscopic vasovasostomy.

Authors:  M K Willscher; D E Novicki
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Vasovasostomy: comparison of two microsurgical techniques.

Authors:  I D Sharlip
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Folding-approximating clamp to simplify microvasovasostomy.

Authors:  B Strauch
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Perfect anatomical reconstruction of vas deferens with a new microscopic surgical technique.

Authors:  S J Silber
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  [45 years of microsurgery in urology : Contemporary witnesses report with special reference to vasectomy reversal].

Authors:  Horst Oesterwitz
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Surgery for azoospermia in the Indian patient: Why is it different?

Authors:  Rajeev Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2011-01

3.  Advances in surgical treatment of male infertility.

Authors:  Hyo Serk Lee; Ju Tae Seo
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 5.400

4.  Loupe-Assisted Vasovasostomy Using a Prolene Stent: A Simpler Vasectomy Reversal Technique.

Authors:  Jong Chul Jeon; Taekmin Kwon; Sejun Park; Sungchan Park; Sang Hyeon Cheon; Kyung Hyun Moon
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.400

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.