Literature DB >> 8737436

Interactional group discussion: results of a controlled trial using a behavioral intervention to reduce the use of injections in public health facilities.

J E Hadiyono1, S Suryawati, S S Danu, B Santoso.   

Abstract

Injections are commonly overused in Indonesia. More than 60% of patients attending public health facilities receive at least one injection, which increases clinical risk and has adverse economic impact. This study assesses the efficacy of an innovative behavioral intervention, the Interactional Group Discussion (IGD), for reducing the overuse of injections. This study was a controlled trial in a single district with 24 public health centers randomized to intervention and control groups. Prescribers in the intervention group were invited to one IGD, each of which consisted of 6 prescribers and 6 patients; a total of 24 IGDs were held in a 4-week period, and all invited prescribers participated. The groups, which lasted 90-120 minutes, were facilitated by a behavioral scientist and a clinician, who also served as a scientific resource person. The hypothesized mechanism of behavior change involved reality testing prescribers' assumptions about patient beliefs, imparting scientific information about injection efficacy, and establishing peer norms about correct behavior. Outcomes were measured by a retrospective prescribing survey covering the periods 3 months before and 3 months after the intervention, with samples of 100 prescriptions per center per month. Rates of injection and average number of drugs per prescription were computed separately for each center, and t-tests were used to compare pre-post changes in outcomes in both groups. Results showed a significant decrease in injection use from 69.5 to 42.3% in the intervention group, compared to a decrease from 75.6 to 67.1% among controls [-18.7.0% intervention vs control, 95% CI = (-31.1%, -6.4%), P < 0.025]. There was also a significant reduction in average number of drugs per prescription [-0.37 drugs prescribed per patient, 95% CI = (-0.04, -0.52), P < 0.05], indicating that injections were not substituted with other drugs. We conclude that the IGD significantly reduces the overuse of injections. It is suggested to try out other behavioral interventions to improve the rational use of drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8737436     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00391-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  20 in total

Review 1.  Use of injections in healthcare settings worldwide, 2000: literature review and regional estimates.

Authors:  Yvan J F Hutin; Anja M Hauri; Gregory L Armstrong
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-11-08

Review 2.  Computer-generated patient education materials: do they affect professional practice? A systematic review.

Authors:  Shaun P Treweek; Claire Glenton; Andrew D Oxman; Alister Penrose
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  Towards safe injection practices for prevention of hepatitis C transmission in South Asia: Challenges and progress.

Authors:  Naveed Zafar Janjua; Zahid Ahmad Butt; Bushra Mahmood; Arshad Altaf
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Quality of care provided to febrile children presenting in rural private clinics on the Kenyan coast.

Authors:  T O Abuya; C S Molynuex; A S S Orago; S Were; V Marsh
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 0.927

5.  Effects of China's national essential medicines policy on the use of injection in primary health facilities.

Authors:  Xiaoxi Xiang; Chunyan Yang; Difei Wang; Jing Ye; Xinping Zhang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2012-08-11

Review 6.  Improving Injectable Medicines Prescription in Outpatient Services: A Path Towards Rational Use of Medicines in Iran.

Authors:  Firoozeh Bairami; Fatemeh Soleymani; Arash Rashidian
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2016-03-05

7.  Pharmacotherapeutic circles. Results of an 18-month peer-review prescribing-improvement programme for general practitioners.

Authors:  L von Ferber; J Bausch; I Köster; I Schubert; P Ihle
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  What Happens When "Germs Don't Get Killed and They Attack Again and Again": Perceptions of Antimicrobial Resistance in the Context of Diarrheal Disease Treatment Among Laypersons and Health-Care Providers in Karachi, Pakistan.

Authors:  Heather A Joseph; Mubina Agboatwalla; Jacqueline Hurd; Kara Jacobs-Slifka; Adam Pitz; Anna Bowen
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 2.345

Review 9.  Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.

Authors:  Louise Forsetlund; Arild Bjørndal; Arash Rashidian; Gro Jamtvedt; Mary Ann O'Brien; Fredric Wolf; Dave Davis; Jan Odgaard-Jensen; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-04-15

10.  Outpatient prescription practices in rural township health centers in Sichuan Province, China.

Authors:  Qian Jiang; Bo Nancy Yu; Guiying Ying; Jiaqiang Liao; Huaping Gan; James Blanchard; Juying Zhang
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.