Literature DB >> 8736223

Spatial frequency sweep pattern reversal VER acuity vs Snellen visual acuity: effect of optical defocus.

O Katsumi1, M Arai, R Wajima, S Denno, T Hirose.   

Abstract

The effect of artificially induced image defocusing on visual acuities (VAs) measured by spatial frequency sweep pattern reversal visual evoked response (SPVER) and Snellen measurement was studied in six normal subjects. The steady-state SPVER was recorded using vertical gratings of 10 different spatial frequencies ranging from 0.52 to 30.36 c/deg. The SPVER acuity was compared with Snellen acuity (SA) measured under the same conditions of optical defocus. With moderate defocusing [< + 1.0 diopter (D), VA > 20/40], the SPVER acuities were equal to or poorer than the SAs. With more defocus (> + 1.5 D, VA < 20/70), the SPVER acuities became better than the SAs. The discrepancies between the SA and SPVER acuities may be the result of the influence of the parafoveal area on the SPVER at lower visual acuity levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8736223     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00187-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  15 in total

1.  Pattern visual evoked potentials in the assessment of objective visual acuity in amblyopic children.

Authors:  Fatih C Gundogan; Fatih M Mutlu; H Ibrahim Altinsoy; Ahmet Tas; Oguzhan Oz; Gungor Sobaci
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  A new method of extrapolating the sweep pattern visual evoked potential acuity.

Authors:  Peng Zhou; Ming-Wei Zhao; Xiao-Xin Li; Xiao-Feng Hu; Xi Wu; Lan-Jun Niu; Wen-Zhen Yu; Xiu-Lan Xu
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  A comparison of contrast sensitivity and sweep visual evoked potential (sVEP) acuity estimates in normal humans.

Authors:  William H Ridder
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Objective assessment of visual acuity: a refined model for analyzing the sweep VEP.

Authors:  Torsten Strasser; Fadi Nasser; Hana Langrová; Ditta Zobor; Łukasz Lisowski; Dominic Hillerkuss; Carla Sailer; Anne Kurtenbach; Eberhart Zrenner
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Conducting shorter VEP tests to estimate visual acuity via assessment of SNR.

Authors:  Kartik K Iyer; Andrew P Bradley; Stephen J Wilson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Comparing enfant and PowerDiva sweep visual evoked potential (sVEP) acuity estimates.

Authors:  William H Ridder; Bradley S Waite; Timothy F Melton
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Methods of visual acuity determination with the spatial frequency sweep visual evoked potential.

Authors:  William H Ridder
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  Comparison of preferential looking acuity and pattern reversal visual evoked response acuity in pediatric patients.

Authors:  O Katsumi; S Denno; M Arai; J De Lopes Faria; T Hirose
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 9.  VEP estimation of visual acuity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ruth Hamilton; Michael Bach; Sven P Heinrich; Michael B Hoffmann; J Vernon Odom; Daphne L McCulloch; Dorothy A Thompson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  Comparison of Snellen acuity and objective assessment using the spatial frequency sweep PVER.

Authors:  M Arai; O Katsumi; F R Paranhos; J M Lopes De Faria; T Hirose
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.