Literature DB >> 8735796

Central venous access catheters in children with haemophilia.

V S Blanchette1, A al-Musa, A M Stain, R M Filler, J Ingram.   

Abstract

Twenty-five central venous lines (two external 23 subcutaneous ports) were placed in 19 boys with haemophilia A (n = 17) or B (n = 2). The mean age of the boys was 4.9 years (range 0.2-15.3 years). The haemophilia was severe (factor level < 1%) in 18 boys and moderate (factor level 3%) in one. Three boys had circulating inhibitors and three were positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 antibody. Central venous lines were placed to facilitate intermittent factor replacement therapy (n = 6), long-term factor prophylaxis (n = 9), induction of an immune tolerance protocol (n = 2) or therapy for acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-related complications (n = 2). The ports remained in place for 15795 days (mean 687 days, range 11-2059 days). The frequency of port-related sepsis was 48% (11/23 ports in eight boys) or 0.7 port infections per 1000 patient days. Ports were removed from five boys with an unresolved infection (four with Staphylococcus aureus sepsis and one with Pseudomonas sp. sepsis). Other complications requiring port removal included a catheter tip placed too high in the venous system (n = 1), severe persistent pain associated with needle access of the port (n = 1) and a subclavian vein thrombosis (n = 1). Both the benefits and risks of a subcutaneous port should be considered when deciding whether to place this device in a very young child with haemophilia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8735796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis        ISSN: 0957-5235            Impact factor:   1.276


  4 in total

Review 1.  Barriers to primary prophylaxis in haemophilic children: the issue of the venous access.

Authors:  Elena Santagostino; Maria Elisa Mancuso
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 2.  Treatment strategies in children with hemophilia.

Authors:  Pia Petrini
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.022

3.  Results of Port-A-Cath Implantation: A Cross-Sectional Study about a Single Tertiary Cancer Center Experience.

Authors:  Fariba Jahangiri; Mahmoud Salek; Seyed Javad Nassiri; Fariborz Samadi; Mina Koohian Mohammadabadi
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2022-06-15

4.  Complications of chemoport in children with cancer: Experience of 54,100 catheter days from a tertiary cancer center of Southern India.

Authors:  S Aparna; S Ramesh; L Appaji; Kavitha Srivatsa; Gowri Shankar; Vinay Jadhav; Narendra Babu
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.