Literature DB >> 8734744

Lead extraction in young patients with and without congenital heart disease using the subclavian approach.

R A Friedman1, H Van Zandt, E Collins, M LeGras, J Perry.   

Abstract

Pacemaker lead removal using interlocking stylets and dilator sheaths has greatly reduced the need for major surgical intervention when lead extraction is required. Previous reports have shown the utility of this method in older patients, most of whom have anatomically normal hearts. The purpose of this study is to report the results of this technique in young patients with and without congenital heart disease. There were 13 patients (M:F = 7:6) aged 9-26 years (median 13). Congenital heart disease was present in 8 of 13 patients. A total of 17 leads required removal; they had been implanted for 54 +/- 24 months (range 19-94). Leads were removed from the left subclavian vein (13) or right subclavian vein (4) only. Seventeen of 18 leads were completely removed and one partially retained in the left subclavian vein. New leads were implanted from the same vein in 11 of 13 patients. Interlocking stylets and metal or flexible dilator sheaths were used in all cases except two. There was one surgical complication: a late wound dehiscence, which was easily managed. No patient required a transfusion, and there was no structural damage noted in any patient on the postoperative echocardiogram. We conclude that lead removal using interlocking stylets and dilator sheaths from the subclavian approach is an effective technique that can be used in young patients, including those with congenital heart disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8734744     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03359.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  6 in total

1.  Pacemaker laser lead extraction and reimplantation of dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator via Mustard baffle in complete transposition of great arteries.

Authors:  Leo Simpson; Paul S Bhella; Jeffrey M Schussler; Paul A Grayburn; Manish Assar
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2010-07

2.  Comparison of modern steroid-eluting epicardial and thin transvenous pacemaker leads in pediatric and congenital heart disease patients.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Fortescue; Charles I Berul; Frank Cecchin; Edward P Walsh; John K Triedman; Mark E Alexander
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Disparities in transvenous lead extraction in young adults.

Authors:  Andrzej Kutarski; Wojciech Jacheć; Łukasz Tułecki; Marek Czajkowski; Dorota Nowosielecka; Paweł Stefańczyk; Konrad Tomków; Anna Polewczyk
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Device extraction in adults with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  David Cesario; Rohit Kedia; Nirav Desai; Jamil Aboulhosn; Daniel Uslan; Noel Boyle; Osamu Fujimura; Michael Shehata; Eric Buch; Kalyanam Shivkumar
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 5.  [Antibradycardia therapy : Indication and implementation].

Authors:  Peter Zartner
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2016-05-24

6.  Changes in the specific absorption rate (SAR) of radiofrequency energy in patients with retained cardiac leads during MRI at 1.5T and 3T.

Authors:  Laleh Golestanirad; Amir Ali Rahsepar; John E Kirsch; Kenichiro Suwa; Jeremy C Collins; Leonardo M Angelone; Boris Keil; Rod S Passman; Giorgio Bonmassar; Peter Serano; Peter Krenz; Jim DeLap; James C Carr; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 4.668

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.