Literature DB >> 8733545

Construction and application of hierarchical decision tree for classification of ultrasonographic prostate images.

R J Giesen1, A L Huynen, R G Aarnink, J J de la Rosette, F M Debruyne, H Wijkstra.   

Abstract

A non-parametric algorithm is described for the construction of a binary decision tree classifier. This tree is used to correlate textural features, computed from ultrasonographic prostate images, with the histopathology of the imaged tissue. The algorithm consists of two parts; growing and pruning. In the growing phase an optimal tree is grown, based on the concept of mutual information. After growing, the tree is pruned by an alternating interaction of two data sets. Moreover, the structure and performance of the constructed tree are compared to the results using a slightly modified corresponding growing and pruning algorithm. The modified algorithm provides better retrospective and prospective classification results than the original algorithm. The use of the tree for automated cancer detection in ultrasonographic prostate images results in retrospective and prospective accuracy of 77.9% and 72.3%, respectively. Using this tissue characterisation, a supporting tool is provided for the interpretation of transrectal ultrasonographic images.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8733545     DOI: 10.1007/bf02520013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  14 in total

1.  [Quantitative technics in ultrasonic diagnosis].

Authors:  T Zielke; P Nauth; N Stein; W von Seelen; E G Loch; A Gaca; P Pfannenstiel
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Prostate biopsy indices: toward efficient use of transrectal ultrasound.

Authors:  K W Kaye; D J Lightner
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Hierarchical classifier design using mutual information.

Authors:  I K Sethi; G P Sarvarayudu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 6.226

4.  The reliability of computer analysis of ultrasonographic prostate images: the influence of inconsistent histopathology.

Authors:  R J Giesen; A L Huynen; J J de la Rosette; H E Schaafsma; M P van Iersel; R G Aarnink; F M Debruyne; H Wijkstra
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Diagnosis of prostate cancer by transrectal ultrasound.

Authors:  F Lee; S T Torp-Pedersen; R D McLeary
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.241

6.  Analysis of ultrasonographic prostate images for the detection of prostatic carcinoma: the automated urologic diagnostic expert system.

Authors:  A L Huynen; R J Giesen; J J de la Rosette; R G Aarnink; F M Debruyne; H Wijkstra
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Comparison of digital examination and transrectal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of prostatic cancer.

Authors:  G W Chodak; V Wald; E Parmer; H Watanabe; H Ohe; M Saitoh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  The diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma.

Authors:  M K Brawer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Pathologic basis of the sonographic appearance of the normal and malignant prostate.

Authors:  K Shinohara; P T Scardino; S S Carter; T M Wheeler
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.241

Review 10.  Staging of prostate cancer. Value of ultrasonography.

Authors:  P T Scardino; K Shinohara; T M Wheeler; S S Carter
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.