Literature DB >> 8733444

How effective is therapeutic ultrasound in the treatment of heel pain?

F Crawford1, M Snaith.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the therapeutic effect from ultrasound in the treatment of plantar heel pain by physiotherapists and podiatrists, and to quantify the placebo effect of this electrophysical agent.
METHODS: Patients experiencing episodes of plantar heel pain were allocated randomly, at each episode, to receive either true ultrasound (machine calibrated to deliver a dose of ultrasound at 0.5 w/cm2, 3 MHz, pulsed 1:4), for eight minutes, or sham ultrasound (only the timer on the machine activated). Each episode was treated, according to randomisation, eight times. An independent observer set the equipment before obscuring the control panel with a drape. All treatments were undertaken by the same operator. Patients' pain scores were measured on a 10 cm linear analogue scale before the course of eight treatments commenced and at the end of the course, and analysed using a Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks test.
RESULTS: Nineteen patients experienced episodes of heel pain (seven bilateral). Both groups showed a reduction in pain; the improvement was 30% in the treated group and 25% in the placebo group (p = 0.5).
CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic ultrasound at a dosage of 0.5 w/cm2, 3 MHz, pulsed 1:4, for eight minutes is no more effective than placebo in the treatment of plantar heel pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8733444      PMCID: PMC1010148          DOI: 10.1136/ard.55.4.265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  10 in total

1.  The effect of ultrasound on conduction velocity of peripheral nerve.

Authors:  P W MADSEN; J W GERSTEN
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1961-09       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Changes of potentials and temperature gradients in membranes caused by ultrasound.

Authors:  J F LEHMANN; R BIEGLER
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1954-05       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  An evaluation of the clinical use of ultrasonics.

Authors:  B B GRYNBAUM
Journal:  Am J Phys Med       Date:  1954-02

4.  Ultrasound and some podiatric considerations.

Authors:  J Bruno; A E Helfand
Journal:  J Am Podiatry Assoc       Date:  1976-09

5.  The effect of ultrasound on the potassium content of rat thymocytes in vitro.

Authors:  I V Chapman
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  The management of subcalcaneal pain.

Authors:  G A Snook; O D Chrisman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1972 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Ultrasound-induced changes in rates of influx and efflux of potassium ions in rat thymocytes in vitro.

Authors:  I V Chapman; N A MacNally; S Tucker
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Comparison of auranofin, gold sodium thiomalate, and placebo in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. A controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  J R Ward; H J Williams; M J Egger; J C Reading; E Boyce; M Altz-Smith; C O Samuelson; R F Willkens; M A Solsky; S P Hayes
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1983-11

9.  Ultrasound therapy of subacromial bursitis. A double blind trial.

Authors:  D S Downing; A Weinstein
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1986-02

10.  Is therapeutic ultrasound effective in treating soft tissue lesions?

Authors:  A Binder; G Hodge; A M Greenwood; B L Hazleman; D P Page Thomas
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-02-16
  10 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  The foot in sport.

Authors:  K P Sherman
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Conservative therapy for plantar fasciitis: a narrative review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Kent Stuber; Kevyn Kristmanson
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2006-06

3.  Comparative efficacy of corticosteroid injection and non-invasive treatments for plantar fasciitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chien-Min Chen; Meng Lee; Chia-Hung Lin; Chia-Hao Chang; Chu-Hsu Lin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.