Literature DB >> 8732563

Decision making for the critically ill neonate near the end of life.

L A Cook1, J F Watchko.   

Abstract

Our purpose was to review the medical records of 122 infants who died in our neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) to characterize decision making for the critically ill neonate near the end of life. The majority of deaths (72%) were related to some complication of prematurity. Families participated in the decision-making process in 75% of the instances. A decision was made to limit, withdraw, or withhold life-sustaining treatment for 82% of the infants. At the time of decision making, prognosis was judged to be poor or hopeless and the burdens of treatment unacceptable for 90% of the infants. This study confirms that health care providers and families together can confront the ethical decision of whether to continue or forego life-sustaining treatment for the critically ill neonate near the end of life and, in the majority of cases, will choose to limit, withdraw, or withhold such support.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8732563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinatol        ISSN: 0743-8346            Impact factor:   2.521


  11 in total

Review 1.  [Resuscitation of newborn infants].

Authors:  T M Berger; S Pilgrim
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  The decision making process regarding the withdrawal or withholding of potential life-saving treatments in a children's hospital.

Authors:  K Street; R Ashcroft; J Henderson; A V Campbell
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Parent decision making for life support for extremely premature infants: from the prenatal through end-of-life period.

Authors:  Teresa T Moro; Karen Kavanaugh; Teresa A Savage; Maria R Reyes; Robert E Kimura; Rama Bhat
Journal:  J Perinat Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2011 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.638

4.  End-of-life experiences of nurses and physicians in the newborn intensive care unit.

Authors:  E G Epstein
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 2.521

5.  Clinical data predict neurodevelopmental outcome better than head ultrasound in extremely low birth weight infants.

Authors:  Eduardo Broitman; Namasivayam Ambalavanan; Rosemary D Higgins; Betty R Vohr; Abhik Das; Brinda Bhaskar; Kennan Murray; Susan R Hintz; Waldemar A Carlo
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 4.406

6.  Decisions concerning potentially life-sustaining treatments in paediatric nephrology: a multicentre study in French-speaking countries.

Authors:  Isabelle Fauriel; Grégoire Moutel; Marie-Laure Moutard; Luc Montuclard; Nathalie Duchange; Ingrid Callies; Irène François; Pierre Cochat; Christian Hervé
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2004-02-19       Impact factor: 5.992

7.  Supporting parents' decision making surrounding the anticipated birth of an extremely premature infant.

Authors:  Karen Kavanaugh; Teresa T Moro; Teresa A Savage; Maria Reyes; Marguerite Wydra
Journal:  J Perinat Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2009 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.638

Review 8.  Infant mode of death in the neonatal intensive care unit: A systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Matthew Lin; Rachel Deming; Joanne Wolfe; Christy Cummings
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 2.521

9.  End of life in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors:  Helena Moura; Vera Costa; Manuela Rodrigues; Filipe Almeida; Teresa Maia; Hercília Guimarães
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.365

10.  Communicating with Muslim parents: "the four principles" are not as culturally neutral as suggested.

Authors:  Anna E Westra; Dick L Willems; Bert J Smit
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 3.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.