Literature DB >> 8732400

A prospective, randomized study with an independent observer comparing open carpal tunnel release with endoscopic carpal tunnel release.

M B Jacobsen1, H Rahme.   

Abstract

In order to define the role of two-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release, a prospective randomised study with an independent observer was performed to compare endoscopic and open surgery. Thirty-two hands in 29 patients, with symptoms, clinical signs and EMG changes consistent with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome were randomised to either endoscopic carpal tunnel release or open release. No significant difference in sick leave between the two groups could be found, being a mean of 17 days (range 0-31 days) with endoscopic surgery, and 19 days (range 0-42 days) with open conventional surgery. No differences in surgical results were found, but three patients in the endoscopic group suffered transient numbness on the radial side of the ring finger.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8732400     DOI: 10.1016/s0266-7681(96)80097-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Br        ISSN: 0266-7681


  24 in total

1.  The Japanese experience with endoscopic carpal tunnel release.

Authors:  Kazufumi Sano
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Long-term outcomes of carpal tunnel release: a critical review of the literature.

Authors:  Dexter Louie; Brandon Earp; Philip Blazar
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2012-09

3.  A methodological guide to performing a cost-utility study comparing surgical techniques.

Authors:  Achilleas Thoma; Ted Haines; Karen Veltri; Charlie H Goldsmith; Bernie J O'Brien; Caroline Quartly
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2004

Review 4.  Analysis of reporting return to work in studies comparing open with endoscopic carpal tunnel release: A review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Olubimpe Ayeni; Achilleas Thoma; Ted Haines; Sheila Sprague
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2005

5.  Application of the CONSORT statement to randomized controlled trials comparing endoscopic and open carpal tunnel release.

Authors:  Achilleas Thoma; Roderick T Chew; Sheila Sprague; Karen Veltri
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2006

6.  A cost-utility analysis of open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release.

Authors:  Achilleas Thoma; Vanessa H Wong; Sheila Sprague; Eric Duku
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2006

Review 7.  Surgical techniques and return to work following carpal tunnel release: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kaveh A Sanati; Massoud Mansouri; Duncan Macdonald; Shahab Ghafghazi; Ewan Macdonald; Ghasem Yadegarfar
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2011-12

8.  Sickness absence after carpal tunnel release: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Lisa Newington; Martin Stevens; David Warwick; Jo Adams; Karen Walker-Bone
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2018-08-12       Impact factor: 5.024

Review 9.  Early major complications of endoscopic carpal tunnel release: A review of 1200 cases.

Authors:  Raymond W Tse; Lawrence N Hurst; Tawfeik A Al-Yafi
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2003

10.  Open versus endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Eli T Sayegh; Robert J Strauch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.