Literature DB >> 8731537

Genetic testing and early diagnosis and intervention: boon or burden?

E R Hepburn1.   

Abstract

The possibility of early diagnosis and intervention is radically changed by the advent of genetic testing. The recent report of the Nuffield Council on Bioethics is timely and helpful. I have suggested, that not only the severity of the disability indicated by genetic information, and the accuracy of the data, ought to govern the approach to the implementation of screening for genetic disorders. In addition, assessment of the value of the information to those involved should be considered. The efficacy of the available therapeutic measures, combined with the prognostic data are important indices of the value of the information. These measures fall into three categories and thus indicate that three different courses of intervention may be appropriate. Three approaches to diagnosis and intervention are then outlined, drawing on the experience of various clinical initiatives.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8731537      PMCID: PMC1376924          DOI: 10.1136/jme.22.2.105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  6 in total

1.  The right to health in international human rights law.

Authors:  Virginia A Leary
Journal:  Health Hum Rights       Date:  1994

2.  The last well person.

Authors:  C K Meador
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-02-10       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  A private view of heterozygosity: eight-year follow-up study on carriers of the Tay-Sachs gene detected by high school screening in Montreal.

Authors:  S Zeesman; C L Clow; L Cartier; C R Scriver
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1984-08

Review 4.  Ethical issues in genetic screening and antenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  J C Fletcher
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 2.190

5.  Genetic linkage analysis in familial breast and ovarian cancer: results from 214 families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium.

Authors:  D F Easton; D T Bishop; D Ford; G P Crockford
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Risks of cancer in BRCA1-mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium.

Authors:  D Ford; D F Easton; D T Bishop; S A Narod; D E Goldgar
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-03-19       Impact factor: 79.321

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Genetic advances: great promise tempered with concern.

Authors:  B Sweeney
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Funding research in primary care: is Culyer the remedy?

Authors:  Y H Carter
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.386

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.