Literature DB >> 8729527

High prolactin levels may be missed by immunoradiometric assay in patients with macroprolactinomas.

E St-Jean1, F Blain, R Comtois.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Large amounts of antigen may produce falsely low values in immunoradiometric assays due to the so-called high dose, hook effect. The study was designed to identify the clinical and biochemical features of patients with pituitary macroadenomas in whom a high dose PRL hook effect was documented.
DESIGN: The clinical and biochemical features of four patients with the high dose PRL hook effect were compared with those of 54 patients with pituitary non-functioning adenomas and 11 with macroprolactinomas who underwent transsphenoidal microsurgery between 1989 and 1994. MEASUREMENTS: The presence of the high dose PRL hook effect was confirmed by an increase in the initial PRL concentration when the immunoradiometric assay was processed after dilutions of the serum. This phenomenon was observed in 5.8% (4/69) of patients with pituitary macroadenomas. Undiluted median (range) PRL levels were 9140 (1530-83850), 1530 (162-3210) and 2110 mU/l (1470-45,000) in patients with macroprolactinoma, non-functioning macroadenoma and the hook effect, respectively. In patients with the hook effect, the median PRL levels increased to 384,720 (317,520-950,000) mU/l when the assay was performed after serum dilution. The proportion of males was 9.9% (1/11) in the macroprolactinoma group, 46.3% (25/54) in the non-functioning macroadenoma group and 100% (4/4) in patients with the hook effect. Patients with prolactinoma and non-functioning adenoma had mean tumour sizes of 20 +/- 9 and 27 +/- 11 mm (SD), respectively, while in the hook effect group it was 51 +/- 10 mm.
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the high dose PRL hook effect is observed particularly in patients with very large tumours. The immunoradiometric PRL assay must be performed with serum dilution in order to overcome the high dose PRL hook effect in all new patients with pituitary macroadenomas who may have a prolactinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8729527     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.1996.663486.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)        ISSN: 0300-0664            Impact factor:   3.478


  16 in total

Review 1.  Medical management of prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Mark E Molitch
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 2.  The pituitary mass: diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Susan Sam; Mark E Molitch
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 3.  Long-term management of prolactinomas--use of long-acting dopamine agonists.

Authors:  David M Cook
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.514

4.  Hook effect and linear range in prolactin assays: distinct confounding entities.

Authors:  Maria do Carmo Dias Gontijo; Leonardo de Souza Vasconcellos; Antonio Ribeiro-Oliveira
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.107

5.  Pituitary adenomas secreting large amounts of prolactin may give false low values in immunoradiometric assays. The hook effect.

Authors:  M S Petakov; S S Damjanović; M M Nikolić-Durović; Z L Dragojlović; S Obradović; M S Gligorović; M Z Simić; V P Popović
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.256

6.  Cabergoline decreases somatotroph adenoma size: a case report.

Authors:  Michael R Rickels; Peter J Snyder
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.107

7.  Interferences in immunoassay.

Authors:  Jill Tate; Greg Ward
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2004-05

8.  Falsely low serum prolactin in two cases of invasive macroprolactinoma.

Authors:  Christof Schöfl; Beate Schöfl-Siegert; Johann Hinrich Karstens; Michael Bremer; Thomas Lenarz; Jose Sebastian Fernandez Cuarezma; Madjid Samii; Alexander von zur Mühlen; Georg Brabant
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.107

9.  The pituitary stalk effect: is it a passing phenomenon?

Authors:  Marvin Bergsneider; Leili Mirsadraei; William H Yong; Noriko Salamon; Michael Linetsky; Marilene B Wang; David L McArthur; Anthony P Heaney
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 10.  Preoperative assessment for pituitary surgery.

Authors:  Olivia Pereira; John S Bevan
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.107

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.