The assessment of clinical investigations: the Greenwich Grading System and its application to electrodiagnostic testing in ophthalmology.

The aim of the study was to describe the Greenwich Grading System, a simple method developed for assessing the value of a clinical investigation, and to investigate its application to electrodiagnostic testing (EDT) in ophthalmology patients. This was done by means of a retrospective case analysis carried out on 95 unselected, consecutive patients referred from a district ophthalmology department for electrophysiological investigation at a regional neurosciences centre. The classification was developed to quantify the effect of EDT on the diagnosis, investigation and treatment in each case. From this, an overall value of EDT in management could be assessed for different groups of patients. It was found that the classification was easy to apply and analyse. EDT was valuable in 80% of patients referred, and was classified as essential or important in 53 (56%) patients. In no patient did EDT adversely affect the clinical outcome. The diagnosis was changed in 7 (7%) patients, and made in 5 (5%). Diagnostic certainty was increased in a further 62 (65%) patients. Other investigations were avoided by performing electrophysiology in 28 (29%) cases. Treatment was initiated in 6 (6%) cases and altered in 8 (8%). It is concluded that the Greenwich Grading System, as applied to EDT in ophthalmology, demonstrated the value of electrophysiological investigation in ophthalmology patients and identified the patient groups which benefit most from testing.