Literature DB >> 8728446

Overall mortality of cellular telephone customers.

K J Rothman1, J E Loughlin, D P Funch, N A Dreyer.   

Abstract

Unlike mobile cellular telephones, in which the antenna is not part of the handset, a portable cellular telephone exposes the user's head to radio frequency energy transmitted from the antenna. This exposure has prompted concerns about potential biological effects, including brain cancer. As a first step in a record-based mortality surveillance of cellular telephone customers, we report on overall mortality of a cohort of more than 250,000 portable and mobile telephone customers during 1994. We found age-specific rates to be similar for users of the two types of telephones. For customers with accounts at least 3 years old, the ratio of mortality rates in 1994 for portable telephone users, compared with mobile telephone users, was 0.86 (90% confidence interval = 0.47-1.53).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8728446     DOI: 10.1097/00001648-199605000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiology        ISSN: 1044-3983            Impact factor:   4.822


  10 in total

1.  The health hazards of mobile phones.

Authors:  M Maier; C Blakemore; M Koivisto
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-05-13

Review 2.  [Is there an increased risk of leukemia, brain tumors or breast cancer after exposure to high-frequency radiation? Review of methods and results of epidemiologic studies].

Authors:  M Blettner; B Schlehofer
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1999-03-15

3.  Mobile phone use and cancer.

Authors:  M Kundi
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  A novel antioxidant agent caffeic acid phenethyl ester prevents long-term mobile phone exposure-induced renal impairment in rat. Prognostic value of malondialdehyde, N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase and nitric oxide determination.

Authors:  Fehmi Ozguner; Faruk Oktem; Ali Ayata; Ahmet Koyu; H Ramazan Yilmaz
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.396

5.  Increased protein synthesis by cells exposed to a 1,800-MHz radio-frequency mobile phone electromagnetic field, detected by proteome profiling.

Authors:  Christopher Gerner; Verena Haudek; Ulla Schandl; Editha Bayer; Nina Gundacker; Hans Peter Hutter; Wilhelm Mosgoeller
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 6.  Radiofrequency field exposure and cancer: what do the laboratory studies suggest?

Authors:  M H Repacholi
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Mobile phone use and risk of acoustic neuroma: results of the Interphone case-control study in five North European countries.

Authors:  M J Schoemaker; A J Swerdlow; A Ahlbom; A Auvinen; K G Blaasaas; E Cardis; H Collatz Christensen; M Feychting; S J Hepworth; C Johansen; L Klaeboe; S Lönn; P A McKinney; K Muir; J Raitanen; T Salminen; J Thomsen; T Tynes
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Feasibility of a cohort study on health risks caused by occupational exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields.

Authors:  Jürgen Breckenkamp; Gabriele Berg-Beckhoff; Eva Münster; Joachim Schüz; Brigitte Schlehofer; Jürgen Wahrendorf; Maria Blettner
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 5.984

9.  How well do adolescents recall use of mobile telephones? Results of a validation study.

Authors:  Imo Inyang; Geza Benke; Joseph Morrissey; Ray McKenzie; Michael Abramson
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 10.  Epidemiology of health effects of radiofrequency exposure.

Authors:  Anders Ahlbom; Adele Green; Leeka Kheifets; David Savitz; Anthony Swerdlow
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 9.031

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.