Literature DB >> 8728169

Measurement of hydrostatic intraperitoneal pressure: a necessary routine test in peritoneal dialysis.

P Y Durand1, J Chanliau, J Gambéroni, D Hestin, M Kessler.   

Abstract

This paper summarizes our clinical studies on hydrostatic intraperitoneal pressure (IPP), showing the interest of this measurement in routine clinical practice. IPP can easily be measured routinely be a simple and safe method: the measure of the column of dialysate in the peritoneal dialysis (PD) line before drainage, with point 0 located on the midaxillary line. The normal value is 12 +/- 2 cm of water (cm H2O) with an intraperitoneal volume (IPV) of 2 L, with linear increases of 2.2 cm H2O for each additional liter. IPP must be measured to estimate the tolerance of IPV: the maximal permissible IPV is reached for an IPP of 18 cm H2O, squaring with a decrease of 20% in vital capacity and sometimes arising before clinical symptomatology. However, IPP measured at rest could not predict PD mechanical complications (hernias, dialysis leakages, hemorrhoids, etc.), which are more dependent on parietal previous history or predisposition. IPP is significantly higher during the first three days after peritoneal catheter implantation (17 +/- 3 cm H2O) than during the 12 following days (10 +/- 4 cm H2O). It is recommended to postpone the start of PD until after catheter implantation, and patients should remain supine for the first three days. On the other hand, IPP strongly reduces the overall ultrafiltration (UF) volume: an increase of 1 cm H2O in IPP caused a decrease of 70 mL in global UF after two hours. Therefore, IPP should be measured in diagnosis of losses of UF. However, UF loss during peritonitis is not due to an increase of IPP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8728169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perit Dial Int        ISSN: 0896-8608            Impact factor:   1.756


  6 in total

Review 1.  Measurement of hydrostatic intraperitoneal pressure: a useful tool for the improvement of dialysis dose prescription.

Authors:  M Fischbach; J Terzic; V Laugel; B Escande; Cl Dangelser; A Helmstetter
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2003-07-26       Impact factor: 3.714

2.  Improvement in sleep apnea during nocturnal peritoneal dialysis is associated with reduced airway congestion and better uremic clearance.

Authors:  Sydney C W Tang; Bing Lam; Andrew S H Lai; Clara B Y Pang; Wai Kuen Tso; Pek Lan Khong; Mary S M Ip; Kar Neng Lai
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Abdominal compartment syndrome in severe acute pancreatitis treated with percutaneous catheter drainage.

Authors:  Soonyoung Park; Seungho Lee; Hyo Deok Lee; Min Kim; Kyeongmin Kim; Yusook Jeong; Seon Mee Park
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2014-09-30

4.  Identification of the Factors Associated With Intraperitoneal Pressure in ADPKD Patients Treated With Peritoneal Dialysis.

Authors:  Mickael Sigogne; Lukshe Kanagaratnam; Caroline Mora; Malika Pierre; Andreea Petrache; Claude Marcus; Michel Fischbach; Moustapha Dramé; Fatouma Touré
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2020-04-29

5.  Comparison of gastrointestinal symptoms and findings in renal replacement therapy modalities.

Authors:  Doğu Karahan; İdris Şahin
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 2.585

Review 6.  Congestive nephropathy: a neglected entity? Proposal for diagnostic criteria and future perspectives.

Authors:  Faeq Husain-Syed; Hermann-Josef Gröne; Birgit Assmus; Pascal Bauer; Henning Gall; Werner Seeger; Ardeschir Ghofrani; Claudio Ronco; Horst-Walter Birk
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-11-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.