Literature DB >> 8727810

Comparison of surgical treatments for trigeminal neuralgia: reevaluation of radiofrequency rhizotomy.

J M Taha1, J M Tew.   

Abstract

In this study, we reevaluate the results of radiofrequency rhizotomy and review the effectiveness of other surgical procedures for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Five hundred patients with trigeminal neuralgia underwent radiofrequency rhizotomy at the University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, between 1981 and 1986. Their results are compared with those of patients reported in the literature who underwent radiofrequency rhizotomy (6205 patients), glycerol rhizotomy (1217 patients), balloon compression (759 patients), microvascular decompression (MVD) (1417 patients), and partial trigeminal rhizotomy (250 patients). Comparisons were based on the following outcome parameters: technical success, pain relief and recurrence, facial numbness, dysesthesia, corneal anesthesia, keratitis, trigeminal motor dysfunction, permanent cranial nerve deficit, intracranial hemorrhage or infarction, perioperative morbidity, and perioperative mortality. We found that MVD had the lowest rate of technical success. Radiofrequency rhizotomy and MVD had the highest rates of initial pain relief and the lowest rates of pain recurrence. Glycerol rhizotomy had the highest rate of pain recurrence. Balloon compression had the highest rate of trigeminal motor dysfunction. Balloon compression and MVD had the lowest rates of corneal anesthesia or keratitis. MVD had the lowest rates of facial numbness and dysesthesia. All percutaneous procedures had similar rates of dysesthesia. Posterior fossa exploration had the highest rates of permanent cranial nerve deficit, intracranial hemorrhage or infarction, and perioperative morbidity and mortality. On the basis of our experience and a review of the literature, we conclude the following: 1) percutaneous techniques and posterior fossa exploration offer advantages and disadvantages, 2) radiofrequency rhizotomy is the procedure of choice for most patients undergoing first surgical treatments, and 3) MVD is recommended for healthy patients who have isolated pain in the first ophthalmic trigeminal division or in all three trigeminal divisions and patients who desire no sensory deficit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8727810     DOI: 10.1097/00006123-199605000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  38 in total

Review 1.  Skull base surgery for benign skull base tumors.

Authors:  Ketan R Bulsara; Ossama Al-Mefty
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2004 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 2.  [Neuroablative procedures in pain therapy].

Authors:  V M Tronnier; D Rasche
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.107

3.  Angular Relationship Between the Foramen Ovale and the Trigeminal Impression: Percutaneous Cannulation Trajectories for Trigeminal Neuralgia.

Authors:  Matthew J Zdilla; Scott A Hatfield; Kelsey R Mangus
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.046

Review 4.  Iatrogenic carotid artery injury in neurosurgery.

Authors:  Joji Inamasu; Bernard H Guiot
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 5.  Surgical treatment of pediatric trigeminal neuralgia: case series and review of the literature.

Authors:  Matthew T Bender; Gustavo Pradilla; Carol James; Shaan Raza; Michael Lim; Benjamin S Carson
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  Microvascular decompression as a surgical management for trigeminal neuralgia: long-term follow-up and review of the literature.

Authors:  Serdar Kabatas; Aykut Karasu; Erdinc Civelek; Akin P Sabanci; Kemal T Hepgul; Yang D Teng
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 7.  [Ins and outs of neurologic therapy for chronic pain].

Authors:  S Sternberg; F Birklein; A May
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.214

8.  Lamotrigine Versus Pregabalin in the Management of Refractory Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Randomized Open Label Crossover Trial.

Authors:  Ankur Rustagi; Ajoy Roychoudhury; Ongkila Bhutia; Anjan Trikha; M V Padma Srivastava
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-05-24

9.  High-Resolution MRI Findings following Trigeminal Rhizotomy.

Authors:  B G Northcutt; D P Seeburg; J Shin; N Aygun; D A Herzka; D Theodros; C R Goodwin; C Bettegowda; M Lim; A M Blitz
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 10.  Neurolytic blocks revisited.

Authors:  Tracy P Jackson; Raymond Gaeta
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2008-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.