Literature DB >> 8727387

Response properties of units in the dorsal cochlear nucleus of unanesthetized decerebrate gerbil.

K A Davis1, J Ding, T E Benson, H F Voigt.   

Abstract

1. The electrophysiological responses of single units in the dorsal cochlear nucleus of unanesthetized decerebrate Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus) were recorded. Units were classified according to the response map scheme of Evans and Nelson as modified by Young and Brownell, Young and Voigt, and Shofner and Young. Type II units have a V-shaped excitatory response map similar to typical auditory nerve tuning curves but little or no spontaneous activity (SpAc < 2.5 spikes/s) and little or no response to noise. Type I/III units also have a V-shaped excitatory map and SpAc < 2.5 spikes/s, but have an excitatory response to noise. Type III units have a V-shaped excitatory map with inhibitory sidebands, SpAc > 2.5 spikes/s, and an excitatory response to noise. Type IV-T units typically also have a V-shaped excitatory map with inhibitory sidebands, but have a highly nonmonotonic rate versus level response to best frequency (BF) tones like type IV units, SpAc > 2.5 spikes/s, and an excitatory response to noise. Type IV units have a predominantly inhibitory response map above an island of excitation of BF, SpAc > 2.5 spikes/s, and an excitatory response to noise. We present results for 133 units recorded with glass micropipette electrodes. The purpose of this study was to establish a normative response map data base in this species for ongoing structure/function and correlation studies. 2. The major types of units (type II, type I/III, type III, type IV-T, and type IV) found in decerebrate cat are found in decerebrate gerbil. However, the percentage of type II (7.5%) and type IV (11.3%) units encountered are smaller and the percentage of type III (62.4%) units is larger in decerebrate gerbil than in decerebrate cat. In comparison, Shofner and Young found 18.5% type II units, 30.6% type IV units, and 23.1% type III units using metal electrodes. 3. Two new unit subtypes are described in gerbil: type III-i and type IV-i units. Type III-i units are similar to type III units except that type III-i units are inhibited by low levels of noise and excited by high levels of noise whereas type III units have strictly excitatory responses to noise. Type IV-i units are similar to type IV units except that type IV-i units are excited by low levels of noise and become inhibited by high levels of noise whereas type IV units have strictly excitatory responses to noise. Type III-i units are approximately 30% of the type III population and type IV-i units are approximately 50% of the type IV population. 4. On the basis of the paucity of classic type II units and the reciprocal responses to broadband noise of type III-i and type IV-i units, we postulate that some gerbil type III-i units are the same cell type and have similar synaptic connections as cat type II units. 5. Type II and type I/III units are distinguished from one another on the basis of both their relative noise response, rho, and the normalized slope of the BF tone rate versus level functions beyond the first maximum. Previously, type II units were defined to be those nonspontaneously active units with rho values < 0.3 where rho is defined as the ratio of the maximum noise response minus spontaneous rate to the maximum BF tone response minus spontaneous rate. In the gerbil, the average rho value for type II units is 0.25, although a few values are > 0.3, and the rate-level curves are consistently nonmonotonic with normalized slopes steeper than than -0.007/dB. The average rho value for type I/III units is 0.54, although a few values are < 0.3, and the rate-level curves tend to saturate with slopes shallower than -0.006/dB. In general, the response properties of type II units recorded in gerbil are similar to those recorded in decerebrate cat. 6. In comparison to decerebrate cat, the lower percentage of type IV units recorded in decerebrate gerbil may be due to a species difference (a reduced number of type II units in gerbil) or an electrode bias.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8727387     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1996.75.4.1411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  15 in total

1.  Dorsal cochlear nucleus response properties following acoustic trauma: response maps and spontaneous activity.

Authors:  Wei-Li Diana Ma; Eric D Young
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Single-neuron recordings from unanesthetized mouse dorsal cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Wei-Li Diana Ma; Stephan D Brenowitz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  A modeling study of notch noise responses of type III units in the gerbil dorsal cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Xiaohan Zheng; Herbert F Voigt
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Auditory processing of spectral cues for sound localization in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Kevin A Davis; Ramnarayan Ramachandran; Bradford J May
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-06

5.  Nonlinear temporal receptive fields of neurons in the dorsal cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Sharba Bandyopadhyay; Eric D Young
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Response classes in the dorsal cochlear nucleus and its output tract in the chloralose-anesthetized cat.

Authors:  P X Joris
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Computer simulation of shared input among projection neurons in the dorsal cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  K A Davis; H F Voigt
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.086

8.  Decoding sound level in the marmoset primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Wensheng Sun; Ellisha N Marongelli; Paul V Watkins; Dennis L Barbour
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Enhancement of phase-locking in rodents. I. An axonal recording study in gerbil.

Authors:  Liting Wei; Shotaro Karino; Eric Verschooten; Philip X Joris
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Generation of intensity selectivity by differential synaptic tuning: fast-saturating excitation but slow-saturating inhibition.

Authors:  Mu Zhou; Huizhong W Tao; Li I Zhang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.