Literature DB >> 8727195

Distractive properties of a threaded interbody fusion device. An in vivo model.

H S Sandhu1, S Turner, J M Kabo, L E Kanim, D Liu, A Nourparvar, R B Delamarter, E G Dawson.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Twenty sheep underwent anterior lumbar interbody fusions with either a threaded titanium interbody fusion device (cage, n = 8), autogenous iliac crest dowel graft (autograft, n = 6), or interbody decortication only (sham, n = 6). Two sheep had misplaced cages and were excluded. Sheep were killed after 6 months.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether this model is useful for examining the distractive and fixation properties of interbody fusion cages. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Interbody fusion cages are used in anterior lumbar interbody fusion procedures to provide immediate intersegmental fixation and to distract and preserve interbody height. The process of physiologic anchorage by bone ingrowth into such devices is under investigation.
METHODS: Sheep were radiographed immediately after surgery and 2, 4, and 6 months after surgery. Interbody distraction and angulation were measured with a digital photo image analyzer at each time point. After the sheep were killed, stiffness to flexion, extension, and lateral bending moments were measured. Twelve untreated cadaver spines were also tested for comparison.
RESULTS: After surgery, interbody distraction successfully occurred in cage and autograft-implanted sites. Loss of interbody height ensued, however, in all groups during the first 2 months. Percentage loss of height was lowest in cage sites. By 6 months, only cage sites remained distracted beyond normal. Fusions in all groups were stiffer than untreated spines. Autograft sites were stiffer than cage sites to lateral bending. Sham sites were stiffer than cage and autograft sites to flexion, but this likely resulted from complete intervertebral collapse.
CONCLUSION: Despite early subsidence, interbody fusion cages successfully distracted and preserved interbody spaces. This model is useful for investigating methods of improving distraction and stabilization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8727195     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199605150-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  11 in total

Review 1.  [Vertebral body replacement in spine surgery].

Authors:  F Kandziora; K J Schnake; C K Klostermann; N P Haas
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  [Biodegradable cage. Osteointegration in spondylodesis of the sheep cervical spine].

Authors:  R Pflugmacher; T Eindorf; M Scholz; S Gumnior; C Krall; P Schleicher; N P Haas; F Kandziora
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Subsidence after anterior lumbar interbody fusion using paired stand-alone rectangular cages.

Authors:  Jae Young Choi; Kyeong Hoon Sung
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Subsidence following anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF): a prospective study.

Authors:  Prashanth J Rao; Kevin Phan; Gloria Giang; Monish M Maharaj; Steven Phan; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06

5.  In vivo experimental study of hat type cervical intervertebral fusion cage (HCIFC).

Authors:  Yu-tong Gu; Zhen-jun Yao; Lian-shun Jia; Jin Qi; Jun Wang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  A two-cage reconstruction versus a single mega-cage reconstruction for lumbar interbody fusion: an experimental comparison.

Authors:  Hideki Murakami; William C Horton; Katsuro Tomita; William C Hutton
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-03-27       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Does disc space height of fused segment affect adjacent disc degeneration in anterior lumbar interbody fusion? A radiological study.

Authors:  Sh Tang; W Xu
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 0.611

8.  MRI measurement of neuroforaminal dimension at the index and supradjacent levels after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective study.

Authors:  Woojin Cho; Mark J Sokolowski; Amir A Mehbod; Francis Denis; Timothy A Garvey; John Perl; Ensor E Transfeldt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2013-02-20

9.  A surgical option for multilevel anterior lumbar interbody fusion with ponte osteotomy to achieve optimal lumbar lordosis and sagittal balance.

Authors:  Loo-Ree Suh; Dae-Jean Jo; Sung-Min Kim; Young-Jin Lim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2012-10-22

10.  Biomechanical evaluation of immediate stability with rectangular versus cylindrical interbody cages in stabilization of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Dilip K Sengupta; S M H Mehdian; Robert C Mulholland; John K Webb; Donna D Ohnmeiss
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2002-10-03       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.