Literature DB >> 8725799

Comparison of polymerase chain reaction and microbiological culture for detection of salmonellae in equine feces and environmental samples.

N D Cohen1, L J Martin, R B Simpson, D E Wallis, H L Neibergs.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the sensitivity of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with microbiological culture for detecting salmonellae in equine fecal samples and equine environmental swab specimens.
DESIGN: Samples and specimens were tested by PCR and microbiological culture. SAMPLE POPULATION: A fecal sample from each of 152 horses admitted consecutively to the clinic for evaluation by the outpatient service, 282 fecal samples from 110 hospitalized horses that had been submitted to the clinical microbiology laboratory, and 313 environmental swab specimens were examined. PROCEDURE: Each sample and specimen in the study was tested, using PCR and microbiological culture. Results of PCR and culture were compared.
RESULTS: Significantly (P < 0.001) more fecal samples were positive by PCR than by microbiological culture. 26 of 152 (17.1%) fecal samples collected from horses admitted by the outpatient service were positive by PCR and none was positive by culture. 71 of 110 hospitalized horses were identified as positive by PCR, compared with 11 horses identified as positive by culture. All culture-positive horses were positive by PCR. Of the 11 culture-positive horses, 10 (90.9%) were identified as PCR positive after testing of the first sample submitted, compared with 7 (63.6%) by culture. All PCR-positive horses were detected after a total of 3 samples/horse were submitted, whereas as many as 5 samples/horse was required to identify all culture-positive horses. 8 of 313 environmental specimens were positive by PCR, and none was positive by culture.
CONCLUSION: The PCR method reported here was more sensitive, more rapid, and required submission of fewer samples or specimens than did microbiological culture for detecting salmonellae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8725799

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Vet Res        ISSN: 0002-9645            Impact factor:   1.156


  12 in total

Review 1.  Differentiation of gastrointestinal diseases of calves.

Authors:  C B Navarre; E B Belknap; S E Rowe
Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.357

2.  Detection of salmonellae in chicken feces by a combination of tetrathionate broth enrichment, capillary PCR, and capillary gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  K T Carli; C B Unal; V Caner; A Eyigor
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Influence of temperature and predation on survival of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and expression of invA in soil and manure-amended soil.

Authors:  R García; J Baelum; L Fredslund; P Santorum; C S Jacobsen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Comparison of cultivation and PCR-hybridization for detection of Salmonella in porcine fecal and water samples.

Authors:  I Feder; J C Nietfeld; J Galland; T Yeary; J M Sargeant; R Oberst; M L Tamplin; J B Luchansky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Identification of two phylogenetically related organisms from feces by PCR for detection of Salmonella spp.

Authors:  Claudia Gentry-Weeks; H Joel Hutcheson; Lisa Marie Kim; Denise Bolte; Josie Traub-Dargatz; Paul Morley; Barbara Powers; Michael Jessen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Bacterial and viral enterocolitis in horses: a review.

Authors:  Francisco A Uzal; Luis G Arroyo; Mauricio A Navarro; Diego E Gomez; Javier Asín; Eileen Henderson
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 1.569

7.  Comparison of bacterial enriched-broth culture, enzyme linked immunosorbent assay, and broth culture-polymerase chain reaction techniques for identifying asymptomatic infections with Salmonella in swine.

Authors:  Jennifer Sibley; Binbin Yue; Fei Huang; John Harding; Jill Kingdon; Manuel Chirino-Trejo; Greg D Appleyard
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.310

Review 8.  Antimicrobial resistant Salmonella in dairy cattle in the United States.

Authors:  Kimberly A Alexander; Lorin D Warnick; Martin Wiedmann
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 2.459

9.  [Prevalence of infections caused by Salmonella spp. in cattle and horses at the Veterinary Teaching Hospital of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine of the University of Montreal].

Authors:  B Ravary; G Fecteau; R Higgins; J Paré; J P Lavoie
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.008

10.  Detection of viruses in used ventilation filters from two large public buildings.

Authors:  Sagar M Goyal; Senthilvelan Anantharaman; M A Ramakrishnan; Suchitra Sajja; Seung Won Kim; Nicholas J Stanley; James E Farnsworth; Thomas H Kuehn; Peter C Raynor
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.