Literature DB >> 8724821

What difference does it make to be treated in a clinical trial? A pilot study.

C Weijer1, B Freedman, A Fuks, J Robbins, S Shapiro, M Skrutkowska.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Pilot study to characterize treatment differences between patients treated in clinical trials and those treated in a clinical setting. Previous studies have shown higher survival rates for participants in trials of cancer therapy. This difference is observed even after rates are adjusted for important covariates such as age and stage of disease.
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review.
SETTING: Oncology outpatient department in a tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Ninety women 18 to 70 years of age with early-stage breast cancer who were diagnosed in 1990. Fifty-one of the women were treated through clinical trials and 39 were treated outside of clinical trials. OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of blood tests, telephone calls, clinic visits and imaging procedures as well as intensity of chemotherapy and use of radiation therapy. The age of the patient and the stage of disease were important covariates.
RESULTS: After the analysis was controlled for patient age and stage of disease, patients treated through a clinical trial were more likely to receive standard-dose chemotherapy (p = 0.020, 95% confidence interval 1.20 to 200.73) and more frequent blood tests (p < 0.001, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.13) than other patients treated in the clinic.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide a plausible mechanism for the observed survival advantage for participants in clinical trials in oncology. Further study is called for. If these results are confirmed, they have important implications for informed consent to participate in clinical trials and for clinical practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8724821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Invest Med        ISSN: 0147-958X            Impact factor:   0.825


  5 in total

1.  Palliative care research: trading ethics for an evidence base.

Authors:  A M Jubb
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 2.  Clinical research methodology I: introduction to randomized trials.

Authors:  Lillian S Kao; Jon E Tyson; Martin L Blakely; Kevin P Lally
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 3.  Recent advances: oncology.

Authors:  M H Tattersall; H Thomas
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-02-13

4.  Do clinical trials improve quality of care? A comparison of clinical processes and outcomes in patients in a clinical trial and similar patients outside a trial where both groups are managed according to a strict protocol.

Authors:  J West; J Wright; D Tuffnell; D Jankowicz; R West
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-06

Review 5.  Outcomes of patients who participate in randomized controlled trials compared to similar patients receiving similar interventions who do not participate.

Authors:  Gunn Elisabeth Vist; Dianne Bryant; Lyndsay Somerville; Trevor Birminghem; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-07-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.