Literature DB >> 8724510

Use of spermicide and impact of prophylactic condom use among sex workers in Santa Fe de Bogota, Colombia.

G Farr1, L A Acosta Castro, R DiSantostefano, E Claassen, F Olguin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Condom use is one of the most important preventive measures sex workers can take to reduce the risk of becoming infected with a sexually transmitted disease. However, a client may refuse to use a condom when requested. Some sexually transmitted disease prevention programs are recommending that sex workers use spermicide as an alternative prophylaxis when a condom is refused, yet little is known about the effect of this recommendation on prophylactic condom use. GOAL: To determine if using spermicide, either in conjunction with condoms or as a backup, influenced overall condom use among a group of sex workers at high risk of sexually transmitted diseases in Santa Fe de Bogota, Colombia. STUDY
DESIGN: Participants were assigned randomly to one of three condom use groups: use of condoms only (Condoms Only), use of condoms and spermicides concurrently (Condom and Spermicide), or use of spermicide when condoms were refused (Spermicide as a Backup). A total of 199 sex workers entered the study and were asked to return for follow-up every 2 weeks for a period of 12 weeks.
RESULTS: Women assigned to the Spermicide as a Backup group used a condom for an average of 78.1% of their reported acts of intercourse, compared with an average of 94.5% in the Condom Only and 92.3% in the Condom and Spermicide groups. However, women in the Spermicide as a Backup group used a condom or spermicide for an average of 96.9% of their acts of intercourse. Condoms were used for every intercourse act by less than 5% of the women in the Spermicide as a Backup groups, compared with 50.7% in the Condom Only group and 41.2% in the Condom and Spermicide group (P 0.001). When condoms were not used, client refusal was the primary reason reported. The incidence of sexually transmitted diseases and other urogenital inflammations in all groups was lower than expected.
CONCLUSIONS: Among Colombian sex workers, condom use declined substantially when women were instructed to use spermicides if they were unable to persuade their partner to use a condom. However, these same women usually used the study spermicide as an alternate prophylaxis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Americas; Barrier Methods; Behavior; Colombia; Condom; Contraception; Contraceptive Methods; Developing Countries; Family Planning; Latin America; Prostitutes--women; Research Report; Risk Reduction Behavior; Sex Behavior; South America; Vaginal Spermicides

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8724510     DOI: 10.1097/00007435-199605000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Dis        ISSN: 0148-5717            Impact factor:   2.830


  9 in total

Review 1.  Female-initiated barrier methods for the prevention of STI/HIV: where are we now? Where should we go?

Authors:  M Latka
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Preexposure prophylaxis and predicted condom use among high-risk men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Sarit A Golub; William Kowalczyk; Corina L Weinberger; Jeffrey T Parsons
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.731

Review 3.  Interventions for encouraging sexual behaviours intended to prevent cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan P Shepherd; Geoff K Frampton; Petra Harris
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-04-13

Review 4.  Ethical challenges in efficacy trials of vaginal microbicides for HIV prevention.

Authors:  I de Zoysa; C J Elias; M E Bentley
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  The repertoire of human efforts to avoid sexually transmissible diseases: past and present. Part 2: Strategies used during or after sex.

Authors:  B Donovan
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.519

6.  A brief sexual barrier intervention for women living with AIDS: acceptability, use, and ethnicity.

Authors:  D L Jones; S M Weiss; R Malow; M Ishii; J Devieux; H Stanley; A Cassells; J N Tobin; E Brondolo; A LaPerriere; J Efantis-Potter; M J O'Sullivan; N Schneiderman
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.671

7.  Effects of messaging about multiple biomedical and behavioral HIV prevention methods on intentions to use among US MSM: results of an experimental messaging study.

Authors:  Brian Mustanski; Daniel T Ryan; Travis Sanchez; Craig Sineath; Kathryn Macapagal; Patrick S Sullivan
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2014-09

8.  Ourselves, our bodies, our realities: an HIV prevention intervention for women with severe mental illness.

Authors:  P Y Collins; P A Geller; S Miller; P Toro; E S Susser
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.671

Review 9.  Are dual-method messages undermining STI/HIV prevention?

Authors:  Ann O'Leary
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-11-15
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.