Literature DB >> 8723446

Population pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime in cystic fibrosis patients analyzed by using a nonparametric algorithm and optimal sampling strategy.

A A Vinks1, J W Mouton, D J Touw, H G Heijerman, M Danhof, W Bakker.   

Abstract

Postinfusion data obtained from 17 patients with cystic fibrosis participating in two clinical trials were used to develop population models for ceftazidime pharmacokinetics during continuous infusion. Determinant (D)-optimal sampling strategy (OSS) was used to evaluate the benefits of merging four maximally informative sampling times with population modeling. Full and sparse D-optimal sampling data sets were analyzed with the nonparametric expectation maximization (NPEM) algorithm and compared with the model obtained by the traditional standard two-stage approach. Individual pharmacokinetic parameter estimates were calculated by weighted nonlinear least-squares regression and by maximum a posteriori probability Bayesian estimator. Individual parameter estimates obtained with four D-optimally timed serum samples (OSS4) showed excellent correlation with parameter estimates obtained by using full data sets. The parameters of interest, clearance and volume of distribution, showed excellent agreement (R2 = 0.89 and R2 = 0.86). The ceftazidime population models were described as two-compartment kslope models, relating elimination constants to renal function. The NPEM-OSS4 model was described by the equations kel = 0.06516+ (0.00708.CLCR) and V1 = 0.1773 +/- 0.0406 liter/kg where CLCR is creatinine clearance in milliliters per minute per 1.73 m2, V1 is the volume of distribution of the central compartment, and kel is the elimination rate constant. Predictive performance evaluation for 31 patients with data which were not part of the model data sets showed that the NPEM-ALL model performed best, with significantly better precision than that of the standard two-stage model (P < 0.001). Predictions with the NPEM-OSS4 model were as precise as those with the NPEM-ALL model but slightly biased (-2.2 mg/liter; P < 0.01). D-optimal monitoring strategies coupled with population modeling results in useful and cost-effective population models and will be of advantage in clinical practice, as it allows pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling with sparse data, thus describing the relationship between ceftazidime exposure and response in the treatment of acute exacerbations in patients with cystic fibrosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8723446      PMCID: PMC163271          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.40.5.1091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  15 in total

1.  Optimal sampling theory and population modelling: application to determination of the influence of the microgravity environment on drug distribution and elimination.

Authors:  G L Drusano
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.126

Review 2.  Individualising gentamicin dosage regimens. A comparative review of selected models, data fitting methods and monitoring strategies.

Authors:  R W Jelliffe; T Iglesias; A K Hurst; K A Foo; J Rodriguez
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Estimation of population characteristics of pharmacokinetic parameters from routine clinical data.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; B Rosenberg; V V Marathe
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1977-10

4.  Some suggestions for measuring predictive performance.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; S L Beal
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1981-08

5.  Optimal sampling times for pharmacokinetic experiments.

Authors:  D Z D'Argenio
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1981-12

6.  Should clearance be normalised to body surface or to lean body mass?

Authors:  T H Hallynck; H H Soep; J A Thomis; J Boelaert; R Daneels; L Dettli
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime in adult cystic fibrosis patients during continuous infusion and ambulatory treatment at home.

Authors:  A A Vinks; D J Touw; H G Heijerman; M Danhof; G P de Leede; W Bakker
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.681

8.  An evaluation of optimal sampling strategy and adaptive study design.

Authors:  G L Drusano; A Forrest; M J Snyder; M D Reed; J L Blumer
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  Prospective use of optimal sampling theory: steady-state ciprofloxacin pharmacokinetics in critically ill trauma patients.

Authors:  G J Yuen; G L Drusano; A Forrest; K Plaisance; E S Caplan
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  A prospective evaluation of optimal sampling theory in the determination of the steady-state pharmacokinetics of piperacillin in febrile neutropenic cancer patients.

Authors:  G L Drusano; A Forrest; K I Plaisance; J C Wade
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 6.875

View more
  10 in total

1.  Assessment of renal function in clinical practice at the bedside of burn patients.

Authors:  J M Conil; B Georges; O Fourcade; T Seguin; M Lavit; K Samii; G Houin; I Tack; S Saivin
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Optimization of Antibiotic Therapy in Cystic Fibrosis Patients: Current Evidences, Gaps in Knowledge and Future Directions.

Authors:  Charlotte Roy; Manon Launay; Sophie Magréault; Isabelle Sermet-Gaudelus; Vincent Jullien
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2021-01-24       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Limited-sampling strategies for anti-infective agents: systematic review.

Authors:  Denise A Sprague; Mary H H Ensom
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2009-09

4.  Ceftazidime dosage regimen in intensive care unit patients: from a population pharmacokinetic approach to clinical practice via Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Bernard Georges; Jean-Marie Conil; Stéphanie Ruiz; Thierry Seguin; Pierre Cougot; Olivier Fourcade; Georges Houin; Sylvie Saivin
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Antibiotics in Adult Cystic Fibrosis Patients: A Review of Population Pharmacokinetic Analyses.

Authors:  Mehdi El Hassani; Jean-Alexandre Caissy; Amélie Marsot
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Population pharmacokinetics of continuous infusion ceftazidime.

Authors:  B C Frame; B F Facca; D P Nicolau; S N Triesenberg
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  An analysis of why highly similar enzymes evolve differently.

Authors:  Fahd K Majiduddin; Timothy Palzkill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Utilization of optimal study design for maternal and fetal sheep propofol pharmacokinetics study: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Catherine M T Sherwin; Pornswan Ngamprasertwong; Senthilkumar Sadhasivam; Alexander A Vinks
Journal:  Curr Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-02

Review 9.  Pharmacokinetic optimisation of antibacterial treatment in patients with cystic fibrosis. Current practice and suggestions for future directions.

Authors:  D J Touw; A A Vinks; J W Mouton; A M Horrevorts
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Continuous vs thrice-daily ceftazidime for elective intravenous antipseudomonal therapy in cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  J Riethmueller; S Junge; T W Schroeter; K Kuemmerer; P Franke; M Ballmann; A Claass; S Broemme; R Jeschke; A Hebestreit; D Staab; K Koetz; G Doering; M Stern
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2009-09-05       Impact factor: 3.553

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.