Literature DB >> 8723264

Evaluation of light traps combined with carbon dioxide and 1-octen-3-ol to collect anophelines in Venezuela.

Y Rubio-Palis1.   

Abstract

A 6-month study was carried out in northcentral Venezuela to evaluate the efficiency of the CDC light trap and the updraft ultraviolet (UV) light trap combined with carbon dioxide (CO2) or 1-octen-3-ol (or both) and human baits to sample outdoor Anopheles aquasalis and Anopheles albimanus populations. The human baits caught far more mosquitoes than did any of the other trapping methods. Comparing each of the trapping methods to the human bait catches, UV light trap + CO2 gave a closer correspondence of the ratio of An. aquasalis to An. albimanus compared with the ratio found in human baits than did any of the other trapping methods. The mean parous rate was significantly lower in human bait catches than in all of the trapping methods except for An. aquasalis in UV light trap with CO2. We consider the UV light trap with CO2 to be the most reliable substitute for human bait catches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8723264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc        ISSN: 8756-971X            Impact factor:   0.917


  5 in total

1.  The Centres for Disease Control light trap (CDC-LT) and the human decoy trap (HDT) compared to the human landing catch (HLC) for measuring Anopheles biting in rural Tanzania.

Authors:  Isaac Haggai Namango; Carly Marshall; Adam Saddler; Amanda Ross; David Kaftan; Frank Tenywa; Noely Makungwa; Olukayode G Odufuwa; Godfrey Ligema; Hassan Ngonyani; Isaya Matanila; Jameel Bharmal; Jason Moore; Sarah J Moore; Manuel W Hetzel
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Comparative evaluation of light-trap catches, electric motor mosquito catches and human biting catches of Anopheles in the Three Gorges Reservoir.

Authors:  Wang Duo-quan; Tang Lin-hua; Gu Zhen-cheng; Zheng Xiang; Yang Man-ni; Jiang Wei-kang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Applications and limitations of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention miniature light traps for measuring biting densities of African malaria vector populations: a pooled-analysis of 13 comparisons with human landing catches.

Authors:  Olivier J T Briët; Bernadette J Huho; John E Gimnig; Nabie Bayoh; Aklilu Seyoum; Chadwick H Sikaala; Nicodem Govella; Diadier A Diallo; Salim Abdullah; Thomas A Smith; Gerry F Killeen
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 2.979

4.  Development of the BG-Malaria trap as an alternative to human-landing catches for the capture of Anopheles darlingi.

Authors:  Renata Antonaci Gama; Ivoneide Maria da Silva; Martin Geier; Alvaro Eduardo Eiras
Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.743

Review 5.  Is there an efficient trap or collection method for sampling Anopheles darlingi and other malaria vectors that can describe the essential parameters affecting transmission dynamics as effectively as human landing catches? - A Review.

Authors:  José Bento Pereira Lima; Maria Goreti Rosa-Freitas; Cynara Melo Rodovalho; Fátima Santos; Ricardo Lourenço-de-Oliveira
Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.743

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.