Literature DB >> 8723188

Guidelines for donor selection and an overview of the donor operation in living related liver transplantation.

T Morimoto1, M Ichimiya, A Tanaka, I Ikai, Y Yamamoto, Y Nakamura, Y Takada, Y Inomata, K Honda, T Inamoto, K Tanaka, Y Yamaoka.   

Abstract

Guidelines for donor selection and an overview of the donor operation are reported on the basis of our experience with 120 cases of living related liver transplantation (LRLT) in pediatric patients. Once the parents had clearly expressed their desire to serve as donors, tests were performed to functionally and anatomically screen the donor livers to determine whether or not the parents' general physical condition allowed them to serve as donors. We then evaluated which of the two parental candidates was more suitable as a donor. The wishes of the family as to which parent should serve as donor was considered secondary and taken into account only in a few cases in which certain functional and/or anatomical abnormalities were uncovered that made the prime candidate less suitable. For the 120 LRLTs, 135 candidates were evaluated as potential donors, 15 (11.1%) of whom were rejected for various reasons. The mean volume of blood loss during the donor operation decreased significantly from 489 g in the first 60 LRLTs to 390 g in the latter 60 LRLTs; this was accompanied by a significant decrease in the mean volume of autologous blood transfused from 449 g to 390 g. Mean cold ischemia time of the graft increased significantly from 71.4 to 128.0 min, while mean operation time conversely decreased from 6.7 to 6.2 h. Bile leakage from the cut surface of the remnant liver, which was the only post-operative surgical complication encountered, was noted in five cases. We conclude that donor candidates should be strictly selected according to basic guidelines, taking into account both the results of preoperative screening and the wishes of the family. With this accumuled experience, we have been able to simplify our LRLT operative procedure, resulting in decreases in blood loss volume, blood transfused, and operation time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8723188     DOI: 10.1007/BF00335387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transpl Int        ISSN: 0934-0874            Impact factor:   3.782


  4 in total

Review 1.  Liver transplantation in the UK.

Authors:  S R Bramhall; E Minford; B Gunson; J A Buckels
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Retrospective analysis of the causes of rejection of potential donors for living related liver transplantation.

Authors:  Khalid Abdullah; Hesham Abdeldayem; Ibrahim Abdel-Kader Salama; Khaled Badah; Badriyah Al-Somali; Abdulmajeed Abdulkareem
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 6.047

3.  Evaluation of standard liver volume formulae for Chinese adults.

Authors:  Zheng-Rong Shi; Lu-Nan Yan; Bo Li; Tian-Fu Wen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Donor rejection before living donor liver transplantation: causes and cost effective analysis in an egyptian transplant center.

Authors:  Mahmoud El-Meteini; Hany Dabbous; Mohammad Sakr; Amany Ibrahim; Iman Fawzy; Mohamed Bahaa; Amr Abdelaal; Mohamed Fathy; Hany Said; Mohamed Rady; Ahmed El-Dorry
Journal:  Hepat Mon       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 0.660

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.