Literature DB >> 8722983

Absorbable and nonabsorbable buried sutures for primary cleft lip repair.

H Shinohara1, K Matsuo, N Kikuchi.   

Abstract

Absorbable and nonabsorbable buried sutures were studied in primary cleft lip repair. Group 1 (N = 56) consisted of patients repaired with buried nonabsorbable material (monofilament nylon). Group 2 (N = 47) consisted of patients repaired with absorbable materials (polyglyconate, polydioxanone). All patients were monitored for 12 months. There were stitch abscesses in Group 1 (14%). There were no abscesses in Group 2. This difference was significant (p = 0.007). Abscesses were located in the suture line with no identifiable distribution. There was no significant difference in the cosmetic appearance of the scars in Groups 1 and 2. These results support the view that absorbable sutures are preferable to nonabsorbable sutures for primary cleft lip repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8722983     DOI: 10.1097/00000637-199601000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  3 in total

1.  6-0 nylon versus 6-0 vicryl rapide in chieloplasty.

Authors:  J K Dayashankara Rao; Payal Luthra; Varun Arya; Vijay Siwach; Anil K Sheorain; Megha Gupta
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016 Jul-Dec

2.  A comparative study of immediate wound healing complications following cleft lip repair using either absorbable or non-absorbable skin sutures.

Authors:  Akeem O Alawode; Michael O Adeyemi; Olutayo James; Mobolanle O Ogunlewe; Azeez Butali; Wasiu L Adeyemo
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-08-29

3.  Importance of various skin sutures in cheiloplasty of cleft lip.

Authors:  Soung Min Kim
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-12-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.