Literature DB >> 8722430

Blood pressure evaluation by noninvasive and traditional methods. Consistencies and discrepancies among photoplethysmomanometry, office sphygmomanometry, and ambulatory monitoring. Effects of blood pressure measurement.

N R Musso1, M Giacchè, G Galbariggi, C Vergassola.   

Abstract

Three hundred eight outpatients referred for hypertension were studied. A continuous beat-to-beat noninvasive recording (Finapres) of blood pressure evaluated the blood pressure increase (9 mm Hg systolic and 4 mm Hg diastolic) induced by office sphygmomanometry. Thereafter, patients underwent a 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. The evaluation against Finapres showed that office sphygmomanometry overestimates the systolic blood pressure by 3 +/- 36 mm Hg (mean +/- 2 SD) and the diastolic blood pressure by 15 +/- 25 mm Hg (mean +/- 2 SD). Blood pressure monitoring showed similar discrepancies. On the basis of both monitoring (normalcy defined from a population of 550 normotensive subjects) and office sphygmomanometry, patients were considered normotensive, hypertensive (either untreated or under active drug treatment), white coat hypertensive (monitoring below the 95th percentile and sphygmomanometry more than 140/90 mm Hg, either untreated or under active drug treatment), and reverse white coat patients (monitoring over the 95th percentile and sphygmomanometry less than 140/90 mm Hg). Patients showed different levels of alert reaction (the highest in white coat hypertensive and the lowest in reverse white coat hypertensive patients), and a similar increase in blood pressure induced by conventional sphygmomanometry. During initial readings of ambulatory monitoring, blood pressure decreased from the first reading to the third reading. This decrease is related to the increase of blood pressure under sphygmomanometry. Caution should be paid in interpreting results of sphygmomanometry (error level in the single patient as high as +/- 40 mm Hg), and interpreting and averaging results of the first hour of blood pressure monitoring (variably affected by the alert reaction to the clinical environment).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8722430     DOI: 10.1016/0895-7061(95)00354-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hypertens        ISSN: 0895-7061            Impact factor:   2.689


  3 in total

1.  Evaluation of noninvasive blood pressure recording by photoplethysmography in clinical studies using angiotensin challenges.

Authors:  T Buclin; C Buchwalder-Csajka; H R Brunner; J Biollaz
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Accuracy in Blood Pressure Monitoring: The Effect of Noninvasive Blood Pressure Cuff Inflation on Intra-arterial Blood Pressure Values.

Authors:  Veena Sheshadri; Akhilesh Kumar Tiwari; Mahesh Nagappa; Lashmi Venkatraghavan
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

3.  Simultaneous compared with sequential blood pressure measurement results in smaller inter-arm blood pressure differences.

Authors:  Niels V van der Hoeven; Sophie Lodestijn; Stephanie Nanninga; Gert A van Montfrans; Bert-Jan H van den Born
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 3.738

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.