Literature DB >> 8719664

Co-induction of anaesthesia: the rationale.

R Amrein1, W Hetzel, S R Allen.   

Abstract

Combination therapy with two or more different drugs, with the intention of reaching the same therapeutic goal, was heavily criticized for a long time. However, it is accepted today, especially when advantages over monotherapy can be shown. For the induction of anaesthesia or for long-term sedation in the intensive care unit, combination therapy may offer an improved effect profile, a more balanced ratio of desired versus adverse effects, an improved time-course of effect, simpler treatment requirements or lower costs. Midazolam and propofol have been investigated as potential partners for those two indications. The mechanism of action, pharmacokinetic properties, pharmacological effect, the way in which they interact at the receptor site, the differences in pharmaceutical formulations, the side-effect profiles and economic considerations were compared. Animal experiments and clinical pharmacology studies have shown that midazolam and propofol have synergy with other centrally active drugs. It could be expected that the relationship between desired effects and adverse effects could be improved by skilful use of the synergism between midazolam and propofol. Co-induction of anaesthesia and co-administration in long-term sedation can offer improvements in therapeutic situations compared with monotherapy. These improvements are in terms of a more suitable effect profile, a more favourable ratio of desirable effects to side-effects, optimization of the time-course of effects and reduced costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8719664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl        ISSN: 0952-1941


  6 in total

1.  A high-volume ERCP service led by surgeons is associated with good outcomes and meets national key performance indicators: results from a British district general hospital.

Authors:  Henry D De'Ath; Sathyan Nagendram; Eleanor Smith; Mohamed Ramadan; Darmarajah Veeramootoo; Sukhpal Singh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 3.453

2.  A comparative study of efficacy of propofol auto-co-induction versus midazolam propofol co-induction using the priming principle.

Authors:  Roopam Kataria; Ajay Singhal; Sukirti Prakash; Ishwar Singh
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2010-11

3.  The cardiovascular effects of midazolam co-induction to propofol for induction in aged patients.

Authors:  Young Soo Lim; Dong Hee Kang; Se Hwan Kim; Tae Ho Jang; Kyung Han Kim; Sie Jeong Ryu; Soo Bong Yu; Doo Sik Kim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-06-19

4.  A Co-Induction Technique Utilizing 4% Sevoflurane Followed by 0.75 mg/kg Propofol in Elderly Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Procedures: A Prospective Randomized Control Study.

Authors:  Omar A Ababneh; Aiman M Suleiman; Isam K Bsisu; Subhi M Al-Ghanem; Walid K Samarah; Khaled R Al-Zaben; Ibraheem Y Qudaisat; Lubna A Khreesha; Ghazi M Al Edwan; Mujalli M Murshidi
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 2.430

5.  Improved Long-Term Imaging of Embryos with Genetically Encoded α-Bungarotoxin.

Authors:  Ian A Swinburne; Kishore R Mosaliganti; Amelia A Green; Sean G Megason
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effect of Etomidate Versus Combination of Propofol-Ketamine and Thiopental-Ketamine on Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Afshin Gholipour Baradari; Abolfazl Firouzian; Alieh Zamani Kiasari; Mohsen Aarabi; Seyed Abdollah Emadi; Ali Davanlou; Nima Motamed; Ensieh Yousefi Abdolmaleki
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2016-01-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.