Literature DB >> 8719219

Comparison of virus replication efficiency in lymphoid tissues among three infectious bursal disease virus strains.

K Tsukamoto1, N Tanimura, M Mase, K Imai.   

Abstract

In order to study replication efficiency of infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) in lymphoid tissues, both the virus titers and the virus antigen titers in four lymphoid tissues were compared among chickens inoculated with Ehime/91 (about 50% mortality), J1 (no mortality), or K (attenuated) IBDV strains during 1-7 days postinoculation (PI). IBDV antigens in tissue homogenates were detected by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. In the bursa of Fabricius, higher virus titers were maintained for 1-3 days PI in chickens inoculated with Ehime/91 or J1 strains, whereas the virus titers increased gradually and reached to the peak on 3 days PI in chickens inoculated with the K strain. There were no clear differences in both the virus and the virus antigen titers in bursae and thymus between chickens inoculated with Ehime/91 and J1 stains. However, the virus and/or the virus antigen titers in spleen and bone marrow of chickens inoculated with Ehime/91 strain were higher than those of the J1-inoculated chickens. Immunohistochemical analyses indicated that larger numbers of IBDV antigen-positive cells were detected in spleen and bone marrow of the Ehime/91 group than in those of the J1 group. There was almost no detectable virus and virus antigens in thymus, spleen, and bone marrow of the K-inoculated chickens throughout the experiment. These results suggest that efficient replication of IBDV not only in the bursa but also in the spleen and the bone marrow may be required for clinical infectious bursal disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8719219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Avian Dis        ISSN: 0005-2086            Impact factor:   1.577


  5 in total

Review 1.  Infectious bursal disease virus: a review of molecular basis for variations in antigenicity and virulence.

Authors:  M M Nagarajan; F S Kibenge
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.310

2.  A 5-year study of the incidence and economic impact of variant infectious bursal disease viruses on broiler production in Saskatchewan, Canada.

Authors:  Tara Zachar; Shelly Popowich; Bob Goodhope; Tennille Knezacek; Davor Ojkic; Philip Willson; Khawaja Ashfaque Ahmed; Susantha Gomis
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.310

3.  Selection of an infectious bursal disease virus mutant with increased immunogenicity following passage under humoral immune pressure.

Authors:  M M Nagarajan; F S Kibenge; A López
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.310

4.  Both genome segments contribute to the pathogenicity of very virulent infectious bursal disease virus.

Authors:  Olivier Escaffre; Cyril Le Nouën; Michel Amelot; Xavier Ambroggio; Kristen M Ogden; Olivier Guionie; Didier Toquin; Hermann Müller; Mohammed R Islam; Nicolas Eterradossi
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Impact of coccidial infection on vaccine- and vvIBDV in lymphoid tissues of SPF chickens as detected by RT-PCR.

Authors:  Susanne Kabell; Kurt J Handberg; Magne Bisgaard
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2006-09-04       Impact factor: 1.695

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.