Literature DB >> 8718976

Significance of interstitial bone ingrowth under load-bearing conditions: a comparison between solid and porous implant materials.

Y S Chang1, M Oka, M Kobayashi, H O Gu, Z L Li, T Nakamura, Y Ikada.   

Abstract

Interstitial bone ingrowth is extremely important for optimum fixation of implanted materials under load-bearing conditions. In this study, three types of biomaterial test piece were manufactured in solid and open-pore structures, and implanted into dog femoral condyles. Bone formation and remodelling were observed histologically and roentgenologically for 24 weeks thereafter. The study demonstrated that, 24 weeks after implantation, thick fibrous tissue surrounded by corticalized bone formed around both solid smooth-surfaced alumina and titanium implants. On the other hand, however, with an implant made of an artificial osteochondral composite material, thickening of ingrown trabeculae could be observed as early as 4 weeks. Bone ingrowth into the titanium fibre mesh was ambundant and increased with time after implantation. This interstitial bone ingrowth resulted in the complete integration of this implant and the viable host bone. Our findings suggest that interstitial bone ingrowth has great significance, even though new bone formation and remodelling follows Wolff's law after the completion of the bonding between the bone and implanted material under load-bearing conditions. The artificial osteochondral composite material could lead to complete integration of the implant and viable bone, suggesting that it is a promising material for joint replacements. Moreover, the tibial joint surface which bore against the polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel surface of this implant remained intact, which suggests that this composite is a very promising biomaterial for use in joint prostheses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8718976     DOI: 10.1016/0142-9612(96)85917-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  8 in total

1.  Processing and mechanical properties of autogenous titanium implant materials.

Authors:  C E Wen; Y Yamada; K Shimojima; Y Chino; T Asahina; M Mabuchi
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 2.  Dental implant systems.

Authors:  Yoshiki Oshida; Elif B Tuna; Oya Aktören; Koray Gençay
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Assessment of bone ingrowth potential of biomimetic hydroxyapatite and brushite coated porous E-beam structures.

Authors:  J Elizabeth Biemond; Tatiane S Eufrásio; Gerjon Hannink; Nico Verdonschot; Pieter Buma
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  A comparison of epithelial cells, fibroblasts, and osteoblasts in dental implant titanium topographies.

Authors:  Fu-Yuan Teng; Chia-Ling Ko; Hsien-Nan Kuo; Jin-Jia Hu; Jia-Horng Lin; Ching-Wen Lou; Chun-Cheng Hung; Yin-Lai Wang; Cheng-Yi Cheng; Wen-Cheng Chen
Journal:  Bioinorg Chem Appl       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 7.778

5.  A Porous TiAl6V4 Implant Material for Medical Application.

Authors:  Axel Deing; Bérengère Luthringer; Daniel Laipple; Thomas Ebel; Regine Willumeit
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2014-10-16

Review 6.  Potential bioactive coating system for high-performance absorbable magnesium bone implants.

Authors:  Murni Nazira Sarian; Nida Iqbal; Pedram Sotoudehbagha; Mehdi Razavi; Qamar Uddin Ahmed; Cortino Sukotjo; Hendra Hermawan
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-10-27

Review 7.  Horizon of exosome-mediated bone tissue regeneration: The all-rounder role in biomaterial engineering.

Authors:  Wentao Wang; Xiaolong Liang; Kai Zheng; Gaoran Ge; Xu Chen; Yaozeng Xu; Jiaxiang Bai; Guoqing Pan; Dechun Geng
Journal:  Mater Today Bio       Date:  2022-07-11

Review 8.  Hydrogels as a Replacement Material for Damaged Articular Hyaline Cartilage.

Authors:  Charlotte M Beddoes; Michael R Whitehouse; Wuge H Briscoe; Bo Su
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.623

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.