Literature DB >> 8718723

Diagnosis and management of the infected total knee arthroplasty.

T D Simmons1, S H Stern.   

Abstract

While infection in TKA is a relatively infrequent complication, it can be devastating in terms of morbidity and cost. Prevention of infection begins with patient selection. Prior knee sepsis surgery, rheumatoid arthritis, and poor general health may lead to an increased rate of infection. Prophylactic antibiotics, meticulous surgical technique, and control of the intraoperative environment have been shown to be beneficial in prevention of infection after TKA. Diagnosis can be difficult and often is heralded by the onset of pain in a previously pain-free knee. Aspiration is an excellent screening tool and is also beneficial in determining management of potentially infected TKAs. In cases posing a diagnostic dilemma, radiographs and nuclear medicine studies also may prove beneficial as well as intraoperative frozen section. Management is based on chronicity of the infection and fixation of the components. Antibiotic suppression is unlikely to yield a cure but may be indicated in the medically infirm. Debridement with component retention may be used with varying degrees of success, especially in the acute postoperative period. The current treatment of choice for chronic infections in this country is a two-stage revision with interim intravenous antibiotics. This would be expected to yield a cure in approximately 80% of patients. Arthrodesis may be necessary in the patient who is status post-multiple revisions with particular virulent organisms. Resection arthroplasty should be reserved for the older rheumatoid patient with limited functional demands. Finally, amputation should be considered in the patient with life-threatening sepsis or the patient who is status post-multiple revisions with intractable pain and poor bone stock.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8718723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Knee Surg        ISSN: 0899-7403


  7 in total

1.  [Logistic requirements and biopsy of periprosthetic infections: what should be taken into consideration?].

Authors:  B Fink; P Schäfer; L Frommelt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  The value of FDG-PET in patients with painful total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Katrin D M Stumpe; Jose Romero; Oliver Ziegler; Ehab M Kamel; Gustav K von Schulthess; Klaus Strobel; Juerg Hodler
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Two-stage revision for infected total knee arthroplasty: our experience with interval prosthesis.

Authors:  N Prasad; V Paringe; R Kotwal; A Ghandour; R Morgan Jones
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-12-05

Review 4.  [Replacement of infected knee and hip endoprostheses].

Authors:  M Militz; V Bühren
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Treatment based on the type of infected TKA improves infection control.

Authors:  Young-Hoo Kim; Yoowang Choi; Jun-Shik Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Noncemented total knee arthroplasty with a local prophylactic anti-infection agent: a prospective series of 135 cases.

Authors:  Michel Assor
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 7.  Antibiotic-loaded cement in orthopedic surgery: a review.

Authors:  Alessandro Bistolfi; Giuseppe Massazza; Enrica Verné; Alessandro Massè; Davide Deledda; Sara Ferraris; Marta Miola; Fabrizio Galetto; Maurizio Crova
Journal:  ISRN Orthop       Date:  2011-08-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.