Literature DB >> 8718052

Using vignettes to collect data for nursing research studies: how valid are the findings?

D Gould.   

Abstract

Vignettes are simulations of real events which can be used in research studies to elicit subject's knowledge, attitudes or opinions according to how they state they would behave in the hypothetical situation depicted. Advantages associated with the use of vignettes as research tools include: the ability to collect information simultaneously from large numbers of subjects, to manipulate a number of variables at once in a manner that would not be possible in observation studies, absence of observer effect and avoidance of the ethical dilemmas commonly encountered during observation. Difficulties include problems establishing reliability and validity, especially external validity. This paper considers the advantages and disadvantages associated with the use of vignettes as data collection tools, concluding with a check-list to help critique vignettes studies.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8718052     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.1996.tb00253.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Nurs        ISSN: 0962-1067            Impact factor:   3.036


  35 in total

1.  Clinical commentary on collinge et Al.(1.).

Authors:  Euson Yeung
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.037

2.  Evaluating physical therapy students' knowledge of and adherence to the ambassador low back pain guideline.

Authors:  Wesley R Collinge; Douglas P Gross; Geoff P Bostick; Greg S Cutforth; Geert M Rutten; Claude Maroun; Rob A B Oostendorp
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.037

3.  Inter-rater reliability of the McKenzie System of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy in the examination of the knee.

Authors:  Sean Willis; Richard Rosedale; Ravi Rastogi; Shawn M Robbins
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2016-09-07

4.  Meeting the educational needs of people at risk of diabetes-related amputation: a vignette study with patients and professionals.

Authors:  Maxine Johnson; Peggy Newton; Moyez Jiwa; Elizabeth Goyder
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Standardized "malhotra-wig vignettes" for research in India : a review with full text.

Authors:  H K Malhotra; N N Wig
Journal:  Indian J Psychiatry       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.759

6.  Staff engagement during complex pediatric medical care: the role of patient, family, and treatment variables.

Authors:  Lisa J Meltzer; Elizabeth Steinmiller; Steve Simms; Michael Grossman; Yuelin Li
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-01

7.  Facebook Displays as Predictors of Binge Drinking: From the Virtual to the Visceral.

Authors:  Jonathan D'Angelo; Bradley Kerr; Megan A Moreno
Journal:  Bull Sci Technol Soc       Date:  2014 Oct-Dec

8.  Measurement Invariance and Convergent Validity of Anger and Sadness Self-Regulation Among Youth From Six Cultural Groups.

Authors:  Laura Di Giunta; Anne-Marie R Iselin; Nancy Eisenberg; Concetta Pastorelli; Maria Gerbino; Jennifer E Lansford; Kenneth A Dodge; Gian Vittorio Caprara; Dario Bacchini; Liliana Maria Uribe Tirado; Eriona Thartori
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2015-11-23

9.  Parents' views of cancer-directed therapy for children with no realistic chance for cure.

Authors:  Jennifer W Mack; Steven Joffe; Joanne M Hilden; Jan Watterson; Caron Moore; Jane C Weeks; Joanne Wolfe
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-09-08       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Sham surgery trial controls: perspectives of patients and their relatives.

Authors:  Teresa L Swift
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.