Literature DB >> 8717577

A randomized comparison of the 3 Papanicolaou smear collection methods.

Z N Kavak1, F Eren, S Pekin, S Küllü.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of 3 cervical smear sampling devices for obtaining acceptable yields of endocervical cells in Papanicolaou smears. In a randomized, controlled clinical trial, we collected 346 smears over a 6-month period, 110 with the Cervex brush, 125 with the cotton swab plus Ayre spatula and 111 with the Cytobrush plus Ayre spatula. The Cytopathology Laboratory, blinded to the Papanicolaou smear method, screened the smears using the Bethesda system guidelines. Statistical analyses were performed using the Pearson X2 and analysis of variance tests. There was an increased detection of endocervical cells in the Cytobrush plus Ayre spatula and the Cervex brush methods, compared with the cotton swab plus Ayre spatula group (p = 2.39 x 10(-6), p = 4.49 x 10(-7) respectively). There was no statistically significant difference between the Cytobrush-Ayre spatula and the Cervex brush sampling methods were equally effective in obtaining endocervical cells in Papanicolaou smears.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8717577     DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1995.tb02165.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  4 in total

1.  A comparison of the cytobrush and uterine lavage techniques to evaluate endometrial cytology in clinically normal postpartum dairy cows.

Authors:  Ramanathan Kasimanickam; Todd F Duffield; Robert A Foster; Cathy J Gartley; Ken E Leslie; John S Walton; Walter H Johnson
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Preoperative cervical cytology as a prognostic factor in endometrioid-type endometrial cancer: A single-center experience from Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Ahmed Abu-Zaid; Mohannad Alsabban; Osama Alomar; Mohammed Abuzaid; Mohammed Z Jamjoom; Hany Salem; Ismail A Al-Badawi
Journal:  Avicenna J Med       Date:  2020-07-03

3.  Evaluation of 37,438 consecutive cervical smear results in the Turkish population.

Authors:  Unal Isaoglu; Mehmet Yilmaz; Ilhan Bahri Delibas; Ahmet Erkan Bilici; Mehmet Esref Kabalar
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.318

4.  Comparison of the Cervex-Brush® Combi and the Cytobrush+Ayres Spatula Combination for Cervical Sampling in Liquid-Based Cytology.

Authors:  Marcelo Simonsen; José Humberto Tavares Guerreiro Fregnani; Júlio Cesar Possati Resende; Márcio Antoniazzi; Adhemar Longatto-Filho; Cristovam Scapulatempo-Neto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.