OBJECTIVE: To investigate the hematologic and economic advantages of using iron dextran as the sole supplemental agent to safely increase and maintain hematocrit levels and iron availability while optimizing erythropoietin dosing in patients on chronic hemodialysis. DESIGN: Iron dextran 100 mg (2 ml) was administered i.v. slow push, undiluted three times per week, sometime during the last 30 minutes of each hemodialysis treatment, until a total required ml (determined by using the package insert's formula) was attained. Maintenance doses of either 25 or 50 mg per week (dependent upon body weight) were administered ongoing to compensate for dialytic and gastrointestinal blood losses. The analysis duration was 12 months. SAMPLE/ SETTING: A prospective analysis was performed on 13 clinically stable hemodialysis outpatients in a rural community hospital-based dialysis facility (mean age 56.4 years ranging from 24-76; sample included 9 males, 4 females). METHODS: The means and medians were calculated for each variable: hematocrit, ferritin, transferrin saturation, and erythropoietin dose. A one-tailed paired student t test was performed on doses of erythropoietin at -1 and 6 months, -1 and 9 months, and -1 and 12 months. Cost per patient of iron dextran loading dose and maintenance, as well as cost savings from actual erythropoietin dose reductions, were calculated at 3, 9, and 12 months. Cost savings reflected the cost of iron dextran. RESULTS: After 6 months on the protocol, erythropoietin doses decreased an average of 3100 units per patient with an 8% increase in hematocrit and 66% and 78% increase in transferrin saturation and ferritin, respectively. Based on averages in actual reduced erythropoietin dosing, a savings of +5,070 per patient per year was realized. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis found the use of iron dextran in the hemodialysis setting to be an effective and economic means to maintain hematocrit values and iron availability while optimizing erythropoietin dosing.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the hematologic and economic advantages of using iron dextran as the sole supplemental agent to safely increase and maintain hematocrit levels and iron availability while optimizing erythropoietin dosing in patients on chronic hemodialysis. DESIGN:Iron dextran 100 mg (2 ml) was administered i.v. slow push, undiluted three times per week, sometime during the last 30 minutes of each hemodialysis treatment, until a total required ml (determined by using the package insert's formula) was attained. Maintenance doses of either 25 or 50 mg per week (dependent upon body weight) were administered ongoing to compensate for dialytic and gastrointestinal blood losses. The analysis duration was 12 months. SAMPLE/ SETTING: A prospective analysis was performed on 13 clinically stable hemodialysis outpatients in a rural community hospital-based dialysis facility (mean age 56.4 years ranging from 24-76; sample included 9 males, 4 females). METHODS: The means and medians were calculated for each variable: hematocrit, ferritin, transferrin saturation, and erythropoietin dose. A one-tailed paired student t test was performed on doses of erythropoietin at -1 and 6 months, -1 and 9 months, and -1 and 12 months. Cost per patient of iron dextran loading dose and maintenance, as well as cost savings from actual erythropoietin dose reductions, were calculated at 3, 9, and 12 months. Cost savings reflected the cost of iron dextran. RESULTS: After 6 months on the protocol, erythropoietin doses decreased an average of 3100 units per patient with an 8% increase in hematocrit and 66% and 78% increase in transferrin saturation and ferritin, respectively. Based on averages in actual reduced erythropoietin dosing, a savings of +5,070 per patient per year was realized. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis found the use of iron dextran in the hemodialysis setting to be an effective and economic means to maintain hematocrit values and iron availability while optimizing erythropoietin dosing.
Authors: Chia Chi Sun; Valentina Vaja; Shanzhuo Chen; Igor Theurl; Aaron Stepanek; Diane E Brown; Maria D Cappellini; Guenter Weiss; Charles C Hong; Herbert Y Lin; Jodie L Babitt Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2013-01-22 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Sunil Bhandari; Philip A Kalra; Jatin Kothari; Patrice M Ambühl; Jeppe H Christensen; Ashot M Essaian; Lars L Thomsen; Iain C Macdougall; Daniel W Coyne Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 5.992