Literature DB >> 8714656

Adaptive control for backward quadrupedal walking V. Mutable activation of bifunctional thigh muscles.

C A Pratt1, J A Buford, J L Smith.   

Abstract

1. In this, the fifth article in a series to assess changes in posture, hindlimb dynamics, and muscle synergies associated with backward (BWD) quadrupedal walking, we compared the recruitment of three biarticular muscles of the cat's anterior thigh (anterior sartorius, SAa; medial sartorius, SAm; rectus femoris, RF) for forward (FWD) and BWD treadmill walking. Electromyography (EMG) records from these muscles, along with those of two muscles (semitendinosus, ST; anterior biceps femoris, ABF) studied previously in this series, were synchronized with kinematic data digitized from high-speed ciné film for unperturbed steps and steps in which a stumbling corrective reaction was elicited during swing. 2. During swing, the relative timing of EMG activity for the unifunctional SAm (hip and knee flexor) was similar for unperturbed steps of FWD and BWD walking. The SAm was active before paw lift off and remained active during most of swing (75%) for both forms of walking, but there was a marked decrease in EMG amplitude after paw off during BWD and not FWD swing. In contrast, the relative timing of EMG activity for the SAa and RF, two bifunctional muscles (hip flexors, knee extensors), was different for FWD and BWD swing. During FWD swing, the SAa and the RF (to a lesser extent) were coactive with the SAm; however, during BWD swing, the SAa and RF were active just before paw lift off and then inactive for the rest of swing until just before paw contact (see 3). Thus the swing-phase activity of the SAa and RF was markedly shorter for BWD than FWD swing. 3. Activity in SAa and RF was also different during FWD and BWD stance. The RF was consistently active from mid-to-late stance of FWD walking, and the SAa was also active during this period in some FWD steps. During the stance phase of BWD walking, however, the onset of activity in both muscles consistently shifted to early stance as both muscles became active just before paw contact (the E1 phase). Activity in RF consistently persisted through most of BWD stance. The duration of SAa recruitment during BWD stance was more variable across cats with offsets ranging from mid- to late stance. 4. The activation patterns of the biarticular anterior thigh muscles during stumbling corrective reactions were, in general, similar to their different activations during FWD and BWD swing. The initial response to a mechanical stimulus applied to the dorsum of the paw that obstructed FWD swing was an augmentation of knee flexion and increased activity in ST and SAm. A mechanical stimulus applied to the ventral surface of the paw to obstruct BWD swing resulted in an initial conversion of hip extension to flexion and a slowing of knee flexion. There was a corresponding recruitment of SAa and RF and an enhancement of background activity in SAm. 5. The two forms of walking are differentiated by posture and limb dynamics, yet muscles participating in the basic flexor and extensor synergies are unchanged. Although central pattern generating (CPG) circuits determine the basic timing of these synergies, changes in the duration and waveform of muscle activity may depend on unique interactions among the CPG, supraspinal inputs that set posture and the animal's goal (to walk BWD or FWD) and motion-related feedback from the hindlimb. Output mutability to each muscle may depend on the balance of this tripartite input; muscles with immutable patterns may rely heavily on input from CPG circuits, whereas muscles with mutable patterns may rely more on form-specific proprioceptive and supraspinal inputs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8714656     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1996.75.2.832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  17 in total

1.  Group I disynaptic excitation of cat hindlimb flexor and bifunctional motoneurones during fictive locomotion.

Authors:  J Quevedo; B Fedirchuk; S Gosgnach; D A McCrea
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Motoneuronal and muscle synergies involved in cat hindlimb control during fictive and real locomotion: a comparison study.

Authors:  Sergey N Markin; Michel A Lemay; Boris I Prilutsky; Ilya A Rybak
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Central and sensory contributions to the activation and organization of muscle synergies during natural motor behaviors.

Authors:  Vincent C K Cheung; Andrea d'Avella; Matthew C Tresch; Emilio Bizzi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Bilateral limb phase relationship and its potential to alter muscle activity phasing during locomotion.

Authors:  Laila Alibiglou; Citlali López-Ortiz; Charles B Walter; David A Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Activity of motor cortex neurons during backward locomotion.

Authors:  P V Zelenin; T G Deliagina; G N Orlovsky; A Karayannidou; E E Stout; M G Sirota; I N Beloozerova
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Task-dependent modification of leg motor neuron synaptic input underlying changes in walking direction and walking speed.

Authors:  Philipp Rosenbaum; Josef Schmitz; Joachim Schmidt; Ansgar Büschges
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Nervous mechanisms of locomotion in different directions.

Authors:  Tatiana G Deliagina; Pavel E Musienko; Pavel V Zelenin
Journal:  Curr Opin Physiol       Date:  2018-12-03

8.  The Spinal Control of Backward Locomotion.

Authors:  Jonathan Harnie; Johannie Audet; Alexander N Klishko; Adam Doelman; Boris I Prilutsky; Alain Frigon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Distribution of Spinal Neuronal Networks Controlling Forward and Backward Locomotion.

Authors:  Natalia Merkulyeva; Aleksandr Veshchitskii; Oleg Gorsky; Natalia Pavlova; Pavel V Zelenin; Yury Gerasimenko; Tatiana G Deliagina; Pavel Musienko
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Medial gastrocnemius myoelectric control of a robotic ankle exoskeleton.

Authors:  Catherine R Kinnaird; Daniel P Ferris
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.