Literature DB >> 8713905

Inter- and intraobserver study of radiographic assessment of cemented total hip arthroplasties.

M Kramhøft1, P M Gehrchen, S Bødtker, A Wagner, F Jensen.   

Abstract

Radiographs are commonly used to identify loosened total hip prostheses. Interobserver and intraobserver variation was studied in an attempt to interpret 60 random pairs of radiographs with a time interval of 6 months to 12 years between the radiographs. Each of the four observers evaluated all pairs of radiographs independently, and the evaluations were repeated after 2 to 4 weeks. Each observer classified the femoral stem and the acetabular cup separately as stable or loose. Radiolucent lines of more than 2 mm were recorded. For the acetabular components, any change in inclination or migration was noted, and for the femoral components, subsidence or any change in varus or valgus of the stem was noted. There was considerable disagreement in observations of the acetabular component; agreement by all four observers was obtained in only 34 of 60 cases (57%). For the femoral component, agreement was obtained in 37 cases (62%). The observers agreed two and two (pairwise) on the acetabular component in 70 to 83% of cases and on the femoral component, in 72 to 82% of cases. Intraobserver variation was great with regard to the acetabular component, with kappa values ranging from 0.489 to 0.633. As to the femoral component, kappa values ranged from 0.737 to 0.800. Interpretation of radiographs of artificial hip arthroplasty is difficult, and comparisons between different series of implants should be made by the same person.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8713905     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(96)80077-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  6 in total

1.  Large acetabular defects can be managed with cementless revision components.

Authors:  E Scott Paxton; James A Keeney; William J Maloney; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Comparison between component designs with different femoral head size in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty; multicenter randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Wataru Ando; Kengo Yamamoto; Takashi Atsumi; Satoshi Tamaoki; Kazuhiro Oinuma; Hideaki Shiratsuchi; Hirohiko Tokunaga; Yutaka Inaba; Naomi Kobayashi; Masaharu Aihara; Kenji Ohzono
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-06-10

3.  Interobserver reliability of the radiographic assessment of cement fixation in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Abdulaziz Al-Ahaideb; S W Muir; J Huckell; Khalid A Alsaleh; M A Johnson; D W C Johnston; L A Beaupre
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2012-10-18

4.  Does a cemented cage improve revision THA for severe acetabular defects?

Authors:  Erik Hansen; David Shearer; Michael D Ries
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Acoustic monitoring (RFM) of total hip arthroplasty - Results of a cadaver study.

Authors:  A C Unger; H Cabrera-Palacios; A P Schulz; Ch Jürgens; Andreas Paech
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 2.175

6.  Accuracy of a non-invasive CT-based measuring technique for cement penetration depth in human tibial UKA.

Authors:  Christian B Scheele; Peter E Müller; Christian Schröder; Thomas Grupp; Volkmar Jansson; Matthias F Pietschmann
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 1.930

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.