Literature DB >> 8712651

Laparoscopic hernia repair in Leicester General Hospital: a prospective audit of 94 patients.

S Marappan1, P S Veitch, W W Barrie, S McCulley, C Barr.   

Abstract

Conventional hernia repair is effective in terms of cure but is associated with considerable postoperative pain and delay in return to normal activity. Laparoscopic repair has the potential to reduce pain and speed return to normal activity, but there have been few published reports of the outcome of this operation in the UK. We present a prospective audit of 94 patients who underwent laparoscopic repair. Of the 94 patients, 87 (92.6%) were male and 7 (7.4%) were female. Thirteen of the repairs were bilateral and 12 were recurrent. Two had to be converted to open repair. The mean operating time for unilateral repair was 56 min and for bilateral repair 98 min. Sixty-three patients (67%) were discharged within 24 h and 21 (22.4%) were discharged within 48 h. There were minor complications in 20 patients (21%), eight of whom (8.5%) developed a haematoma. The other minor complications included seromas (2), bruising at the site of the entry port (2), hyperaesthesia in the groin (2), port hernia (1), shoulder tip pain after surgery (3) and postoperative urinary retention (2). Nine (9.5%) patients claimed to have had no pain or discomfort at all; 35 (37.2%) were pain and discomfort free in 2 weeks. Thirty-two (34%) patients returned to normal activities in 2 weeks. With a median follow-up of 8 months 3 (3.2%) recurrences were noted. It is emphasised that this series represents a learning curve and that the operation is developmental. We are now restricting laparoscopic repair to recurrent and bilateral hernias where the technique offers particular advantages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8712651      PMCID: PMC2502577     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  9 in total

1.  Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  I M Macintyre
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Recurrent inguinal and femoral hernia.

Authors:  F Glassow
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1970-01-24

3.  Inguinal and femoral hernioplasty.

Authors:  K Halverson; C B McVay
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1970-08

4.  Transabdominal preperitoneal herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  J D Corbitt
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1993-08

5.  Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy. Techniques and controversies.

Authors:  M E Arregui; J Navarrete; C J Davis; D Castro; R F Nagan
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Early experience with laparoscopic herniorrhaphy: results after the first 60 procedures.

Authors:  R J Goodall
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Laparoscopic hernia repair.

Authors:  O N Panton; R J Panton
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy: results and technical aspects in 450 consecutive procedures.

Authors:  W P Geis; W B Crafton; M J Novak; M Malago
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: randomised prospective trial.

Authors:  D L Stoker; D J Spiegelhalter; R Singh; J M Wellwood
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-05-21       Impact factor: 79.321

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.