Literature DB >> 8712489

Partitioning the components of maxillary tooth displacement by the comparison of data from three cephalometric superimpositions.

S Baumrind1, Y Ben-Bassat, L A Bravo, S Curry, E L Korn.   

Abstract

Using roentgenographic cephalograms from a sample of subjects with metallic implants, appropriately superimposed tracings were used to distinguish developmental and treatment-associated displacements of the maxillary central incisor and first molar associated "local" changes within the periodontium from "secondary" changes which reflect sutural and appositional growth at more distant osseous loci. Tracings were superimposed on anterior cranial base (ACB), on the maxillary implants only (IMP_MAX), and according to the best fit of maxillary anatomic structures without reference to the implants (A_MAX). Using the IMP_MAX superimposition, one could measure total local displacement at any landmark taking into consideration the effects of all appositional and resorptive changes on the superior and anterior surfaces of the palate, whereas using the A_MAX superimposition one could measure local displacement without consideration of surface appositional and resorptive changes. If the second of these measurements were subtracted from the first, the result would be a direct measurement of the effects of surface appositional and resorptive changes as they are expressed at that particular landmark. This strategy has enabled us to quantify and report the amount of accommodation which occurs at the location of each dental landmark in association with the resorptive and appositional changes which occur through time on the superior and anterior surfaces of the hard palate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8712489     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1996)066<0111:PTCOMT>2.3.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  5 in total

1.  Clinical application of 3D imaging for assessment of treatment outcomes.

Authors:  Lucia H C Cevidanes; Ana Emilia Figueiredo Oliveira; Dan Grauer; Martin Styner; William R Proffit
Journal:  Semin Orthod       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 0.970

2.  Three-dimensional assessment of mandibular advancement 1 year after surgery.

Authors:  Felipe de Assis Ribeiro Carvalho; Lucia Helena Soares Cevidanes; Alexandre Trindade Simões da Motta; Marco Antonio de Oliveira Almeida; Ceib Phillips
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Accuracy of integration of dental cast and cephalograms compared with cone-beam computed tomography: a comparative study.

Authors:  Fanfan Dai; Si Chen; Tingting Feng; Wenhsuan Lu; Gui Chen; Jiuhui Jiang; Ruoping Jiang; Jiuxiang Lin; Bing Han; Tianmin Xu
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 2.885

4.  Superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models of growing patients.

Authors:  Lucia H C Cevidanes; Gavin Heymann; Marie A Cornelis; Hugo J DeClerck; J F Camilla Tulloch
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Radiographic evaluation of orthodontic treatment by means of four different cephalometric superimposition methods.

Authors:  Marcos Augusto Lenza; Adilson Alves de Carvalho; Eduardo Beaton Lenza; Mauricio Guilherme Lenza; Hianne Miranda de Torres; João Batista de Souza
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 May-Jun
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.