Literature DB >> 8712387

Survey of laryngeal mask airway usage in 11,910 patients: safety and efficacy for conventional and nonconventional usage.

C Verghese1, J R Brimacombe.   

Abstract

A survey of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) usage was conducted to provide general information about safety and efficacy with special emphasis on controversial issues such as positive pressure ventilation (PPV), prolonged anesthesia, and laparoscopic and nonlaparoscopic intraabdominal surgery. During the 2-yr study period, of the 39,824 patients who underwent general anesthesia, 11,910 (29.9%) patient airways were managed with the LMA. Forty-four percent underwent PPV. Placement was successful in 99.81%, and in 23 patients the LMA was abandoned in favor of the tracheal tube (TT). Use of the LMA for any intraabdominal procedure was considered nonconventional and occurred in 2222 (18.7%) patients. On 579 occasions procedures lasted > 2 h. A total of 44 critical incidents were documented. Eighteen (0.15%) were related to the airway and none required intensive care management. There were 26 critical incidents not related to the airway which resulted in two admissions to the intensive care unit and one death. There were three cases of failed tracheal intubation managed with the LMA. This survey demonstrates that the LMA technique is safe and effective for both spontaneous and controlled ventilation. Use of the LMA for gynecologic laparoscopy, gynecologic laparotomy, and procedures > 2 h also appears safe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8712387     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199601000-00023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  40 in total

1.  Comparison of LM-Supreme™ and endotracheal tube in patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Bahar Kuvaki; Şule Özbilgin; Sakize Ferim Günenç; Burcu Ataseven Küçük
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  The laryngeal mask airway: potential applications in neonates.

Authors:  D Trevisanuto; M Micaglio; P Ferrarese; V Zanardo
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 3.  [Laryngeal masks. Possibilities and limits].

Authors:  H Hillebrand; J Motsch
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  [Removal of the laryngeal mask airway in the post-anesthesia care unit. A means of process optimization?].

Authors:  K Goldmann; S Kuhlmann; M Gerlach; C Bornträger
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Laryngeal mask airway.

Authors:  L I Wat
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1997-03

Review 6.  ProSeal versus Classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA) for positive pressure ventilation in adults undergoing elective surgery.

Authors:  Muhammad Qamarul Hoda; Khalid Samad; Hameed Ullah
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-20

7.  The LMA for unplanned prolonged procedures.

Authors:  J Brimacombe; J Archdeacon
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.063

8.  The advantages of the LMA over the tracheal tube or facemask: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J Brimacombe
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.063

9.  Spontaneously breathing anesthetized patients with a laryngeal mask airway: positive end-expiratory pressure does not improve oxygen saturation.

Authors:  B Froessler; J Brommundt; J Anton; R Khanduja; R Kuhlen; R Rossaint; M Coburn
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-09-11       Impact factor: 1.041

10.  Postoperative analgesia for gynecological laparoscopy.

Authors:  Ben Gibbison; Stephen Michael Kinsella
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2009-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.