Literature DB >> 8712142

Prognostic value of left ventricular mass and geometry in systemic hypertension with left ventricular hypertrophy.

P Verdecchia1, G Schillaci, C Borgioni, A Ciucci, R Gattobigio, I Zampi, A Santucci, C Santucci, G Reboldi, C Porcellati.   

Abstract

To determine the independent prognostic significance of left ventricular (LV) mass and geometry (concentric vs eccentric pattern) in hypertensive subjects with LV hypertrophy at echocardiography, 274 subjects were followed for up to 8.7 years (mean 3.2). All patients had systemic hypertension and LV mass > or = 125 g/body surface area (BSA) and underwent ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring and echocardiography before treatment. Eccentric and concentric hypertrophy were defined by the ratio between LV posterior wall thickness and LV radius at telediastole <0.45 and > or = 0.45, respectively. Age, sex ratio, body mass index, office BP and serum glucose, cholesterol, and triglycerides did not differ between the groups with eccentric (n=145) and concentric (n=129) hypertrophy. Average 24-hour daytime, and nighttime systolic ambulatory BPs were higher in concentric than in eccentric hypertrophy (all p <0.01). LV mass was slightly greater in concentric than in eccentric hypertrophy (157 vs 149 g/BSA, p <0.05). Endocardial and midwall shortening fraction were lower in concentric than in eccentric hypertrophy (96.5% vs 106.0% of predicted and 71.4% vs 89.7% of predicted, respectively; both p <0.01). The rate of major cardiovascular morbid events was 2.20 and 3.34 per 100 patient-years in eccentric and concentric hypertrophy, respectively (log rank test, p=NS). Age >60 and LV mass above median (145 g/BSA) were significant adverse prognostic predictors, while LV geometry (eccentric vs concentric hypertrophy) and ambulatory BP were not. The event rates per 100 patient-years were 1.38 and 3.98, respectively, in the patients with LV mass below and above median (age-adjusted relative risk 2.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03 to 6.63; p=0.015). In hypertensive subjects with established LV hypertrophy, LV mass, but not its geometric pattern, provides important prognostic information independent of conventional risk markers including office and ambulatory BP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8712142     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)90395-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  33 in total

1.  Efficacy and safety of valsartan plus hydroclorothiazide for high blood pressure.

Authors:  Antonio Ruvolo; Valentina Mercurio; Valeria Fazio; Guido Carlomagno; Teresa Russo; Flora Affuso; Serafino Fazio
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2010-05-26

2.  Hypertension control is needed in elderly marathon runners!

Authors:  Arnoud van der Laarse; Ernst E van der Wall
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  Alterations in cardiac structure and function in hypertension.

Authors:  Mário Santos; Amil M Shah
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 4.  Effect of interaction between left ventricular dysfunction and endothelial function in hypertension.

Authors:  Angela Sciacqua; Francesco Borrello; Marco Vatrano; Rosa Daniela Grembiale; Francesco Perticone
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.369

5.  Echocardiographic evaluation of left and right ventricular function in mild hypertension.

Authors:  S R Mittal; R V Barar; H Arora
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Relation of left ventricular mass and concentric remodeling to extent of coronary artery disease by computed tomography in patients without left ventricular hypertrophy: ROMICAT study.

Authors:  Quynh A Truong; Michael Toepker; Amir A Mahabadi; Fabian Bamberg; Ian S Rogers; Ron Blankstein; Thomas J Brady; John T Nagurney; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.844

7.  The relationship of left ventricular mass and geometry to incident cardiovascular events: the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) study.

Authors:  David A Bluemke; Richard A Kronmal; João A C Lima; Kiang Liu; Jean Olson; Gregory L Burke; Aaron R Folsom
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Rationale and design of the SMART Heart study: A prediction model for left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertension.

Authors:  M F L Meijs; M L Bots; E-J A Vonken; M-J M Cramer; P G Melman; B K Velthuis; Y van der Graaf; W P Th M Mali; P A Doevendans
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.380

9.  QT peak prolongation is not associated with left ventricular hypertrophy in teenage professional football players.

Authors:  Samir Alchaghouri; Kenneth Y K Wong; Raphael A Perry; David R Ramsdale; John D Somauroo; Jason R Pyatt
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.468

10.  Myocardial deformation in aortic valve stenosis: relation to left ventricular geometry.

Authors:  Dana Cramariuc; Eva Gerdts; Einar Skulstad Davidsen; Leidulf Segadal; Knut Matre
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 5.994

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.