Literature DB >> 8712121

Normalization of left ventricular nonuniformity late after valve replacement for aortic stenosis.

B Villari1, G Vassalli, S Betocchi, C Briguori, M Chiariello, O M Hess.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate nonuniformity in pressure overload hypertrophy due to aortic stenosis. Twenty patients were included in the present analysis. Ten patients with severe aortic stenosis were studied preoperatively as well as early (21 +/- 8 months) and (89 +/- 21 months) after aortic valve replacement (AVR) using left ventricular biplane angiograms, high-fidelity pressure measurements and endomyocardial biopsies. Ten normal subjects served as controls. LV systolic function was assessed from biplane ejection fraction, and diastolic function from the time constant of relaxation, the peak filling rate and the constant of myocardial stiffness. Nonuniformity was evaluated from the coefficient of variation of the time to end-systole (systolic asynchrony) and peak filling rate (diastolic asynchrony) of 12 regions in right anterior oblique and left anterior oblique projection. Ejection fraction was comparable in patients with aortic stenosis and in controls, whereas preoperatively diastolic dysfunction with prolonged relaxation and increased stiffness was present in patients with aortic stenosis and was normalized late after AVR. LV systolic asynchrony was present (>25D of controls) in 7 and diastolic asynchrony in 10 of 10 patients with aortic stenosis. Early as well as late after AVR systolic asynchrony was normalized in 9 of 10 patients. Diastolic asynchrony was present early AVR in all but one patient, although there was a significant improvement with respect to the preoperative evaluation. Late after AVR there was a normalization of diastolic asynchrony in 9 of 10 patients with aortic stenosis. Thus, it is concluded that systolic asynchrony is normalized early after AVR probably due to its load-sensitivity, whereas diastolic asynchrony persists probably due to residual LV hypertrophy with increased interstitial fibrosis and myocardial stiffness. Late after AVR, diastolic asynchrony is normalized due to structural remodeling with regression of both myocardial hypertrophy and interstitial fibrosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8712121     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00229-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  14 in total

Review 1.  The extracellular matrix in normal and diseased myocardium.

Authors:  S Hein; J Schaper
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Left ventricular mass index reduction early after an isolated aortic valve replacement with St. Jude Medical 19A-HP.

Authors:  Shin Uchikawa; Shigeyuki Aomi; Akihiko Kawai; Kenji Yamazaki; Yasuko Tomizawa; Hiroshi Nishida; Masahiro Endo; Hitoshi Koyanagi
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2003-08

3.  The bioprosthesis type and size influence the postoperative incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation in patients undergoing aortic valve surgery.

Authors:  Maqsood Elahi; Khalid Usmaan
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 4.  Transcatheter aortic valve insertion (TAVI): a review.

Authors:  B Clayton; G Morgan-Hughes; C Roobottom
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Clinical and echocardiographic features of paradoxical low-flow and normal-flow severe aortic stenosis patients with concomitant mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  Jinghao Nicholas Ngiam; Nicholas Chew; Rebecca Teng; Jonathan D Kochav; Stephanie M Kochav; Benjamin Yong-Qiang Tan; Hui Wen Sim; Ching-Hui Sia; William K F Kong; Edgar Lik Wui Tay; Tiong-Cheng Yeo; Kian-Keong Poh
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 6.  Diagnosis and management of patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Minako Katayama; Hari P Chaliki
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-26

Review 7.  One problem two issues! Left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction in aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Maqsood M Elahi; Anthony Chuang; Michael J Ewing; Charles H Choi; Peter W Grant; Bashir M Matata
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2014-01

8.  Left-ventricular systolic and diastolic dyssynchrony as assessed by multi-harmonic phase analysis of gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with end-stage renal disease and normal LVEF.

Authors:  Ji Chen; Andreas P Kalogeropoulos; Liudmila Verdes; Javed Butler; Ernest V Garcia
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Mechanisms that limit regression of myocardial fibrosis following removal of left ventricular pressure overload.

Authors:  Lily S Neff; Yuhua Zhang; An O Van Laer; Catalin F Baicu; Mark Karavan; Michael R Zile; Amy D Bradshaw
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 5.125

10.  Sex and regional differences in myocardial plasticity in aortic stenosis are revealed by 3D model machine learning.

Authors:  Anish N Bhuva; Thomas A Treibel; Antonio De Marvao; Carlo Biffi; Timothy J W Dawes; Georgia Doumou; Wenjia Bai; Kush Patel; Redha Boubertakh; Daniel Rueckert; Declan P O'Regan; Alun D Hughes; James C Moon; Charlotte H Manisty
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 6.875

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.