Literature DB >> 8711746

Use of physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling to investigate individual versus population risk.

H J Clewell1, M E Andersen.   

Abstract

Because of the heterogeneity of the human population, it is generally expected that there will be a broad range of observed susceptibilities to the biological effects of exposure to chemicals or drugs. Often it is possible to distinguish specific classes of individuals, such as infants or the elderly, who appear to be more susceptible to a specific effect. Non-cancer risk assessment often address this variability by dividing the experimentally determined acceptable exposure level by an uncertainty factor of 10 to protect sensitive individuals; cancer risk assessments typically do not address this issue in any quantitative fashion. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling provides the capability to quantitatively describe the potential impact of pharmacokinetic factors on the variability of individual risk. In particular, PBPK models can be used to determine the impact of differences in key metabolism enzymes, whether due to multiple genotypic expression, such as cytochrome P450 polymorphisms, or just due to normal variation in enzyme activities within the general population. Other potential modulators of sensitivity which can be addressed quantitatively with a PBPK model include physical condition, level of activity, disease states, age, hormonal status, and interactions with other chemicals and drugs. In each case, the PBPK model provides a quantitative structure for determining the effect of these various factors on the relationship between the external (environmental) exposure and the internal (biologically effective) target tissue exposure. When coupled with Monte Carlo analysis, the PBPK model provides a method to assess the quantitative impact of these sources of variability on individual risk (as opposed to average population risk) by comparing model-predicted risks over the distribution of individual parameter values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8711746     DOI: 10.1016/0300-483x(96)03385-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicology        ISSN: 0300-483X            Impact factor:   4.221


  13 in total

1.  Fuzzy simulation of pharmacokinetic models: case study of whole body physiologically based model of diazepam.

Authors:  Ivelina I Gueorguieva; Ivan A Nestorov; Malcolm Rowland
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.745

2.  Uncertainty analysis in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: application to naratriptan.

Authors:  Ivelina Gueorguieva; Ivan A Nestorov; Leon Aarons; Malcolm Rowland
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Reducing whole body physiologically based pharmacokinetic models using global sensitivity analysis: diazepam case study.

Authors:  Ivelina Gueorguieva; Ivan A Nestorov; Malcolm Rowland
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 2.745

4.  Evaluation and optimisation of current milrinone prescribing for the treatment and prevention of low cardiac output syndrome in paediatric patients after open heart surgery using a physiology-based pharmacokinetic drug-disease model.

Authors:  Winnie Vogt
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Development of a physiology-based whole-body population model for assessing the influence of individual variability on the pharmacokinetics of drugs.

Authors:  Stefan Willmann; Karsten Höhn; Andrea Edginton; Michael Sevestre; Juri Solodenko; Wolfgang Weiss; Jörg Lippert; Walter Schmitt
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 2.410

6.  Translational research to develop a human PBPK models tool kit-volatile organic compounds (VOCs).

Authors:  M Moiz Mumtaz; Meredith Ray; Susan R Crowell; Deborah Keys; Jeffrey Fisher; Patricia Ruiz
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2012

7.  Leveraging human genetic and adverse outcome pathway (AOP) data to inform susceptibility in human health risk assessment.

Authors:  Holly M Mortensen; John Chamberlin; Bonnie Joubert; Michelle Angrish; Nisha Sipes; Janice S Lee; Susan Y Euling
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 3.224

8.  A consistent approach for the application of pharmacokinetic modeling in cancer and noncancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Harvey J Clewell; Melvin E Andersen; Hugh A Barton
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Quantitative mechanistically based dose-response modeling with endocrine-active compounds.

Authors:  M E Andersen; R B Conolly; E M Faustman; R J Kavlock; C J Portier; D M Sheehan; P J Wier; L Ziese
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  PBTK modeling demonstrates contribution of dermal and inhalation exposure components to end-exhaled breath concentrations of naphthalene.

Authors:  David Kim; Melvin E Andersen; Yi-Chun E Chao; Peter P Egeghy; Stephen M Rappaport; Leena A Nylander-French
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.