Literature DB >> 8711104

Independent evaluation of the California Tobacco Education Program.

J P Elder1, C C Edwards, T L Conway, E Kenney, C A Johnson, E D Bennett.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To monitor the implementation of tobacco control programs and research in accordance with California's Proposition 99, approved by the voters in 1988, which increased the state's cigarette tax by 25 cents and designated one quarter of the increased revenue-approximately $100 million per year-to develop statewide media campaigns and to fund local health departments, community-based organizations, schools, and agencies working with high risk populations.
METHODS: The authors evaluated the extent and the effectiveness of the implementation independently with standardized forms developed to track any tobacco-related information and activities, local media campaigns, changes in local policies and ordinances, training sessions, and prevention and cessation programs. Activities were reported on the forms to the authors monthly or quarterly.
RESULTS: The evaluation indicated that local health departments, community-based organizations, and other group produced an exceedingly high volume of diverse tobacco control activities throughout the state. They reached a variety of ethnic groups and high risk populations with their programs. The data also show that local health departments and competitive grantees responded with an overall shift in their approach to tobacco control and moved from interventions focused primarily on individual people to broader, more community- and environment-oriented interventions. Additionally, analysis of the wholesale tobacco tax revenues revealed that per capita purchasing continued to decline in California at a rate greater than in the rest of the United States.
CONCLUSION: The evaluation demonstrated that Proposition 99 accomplished much of what it set out to do-reducing tobacco prevalence, reaching out to underserved populations, and heightening the awareness of the dangers of environmental tobacco smoke.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8711104      PMCID: PMC1381881     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  2 in total

1.  Reducing tobacco consumption in California: Proposition 99 seems to work.

Authors:  J P Pierce; D M Burns; C Berry; B Rosbrook; J Goodman; E Gilpin; D Winn; D Bal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-03-13       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Reducing tobacco consumption in California. Development of a statewide anti-tobacco use campaign.

Authors:  D G Bal; K W Kizer; P G Felten; H N Mozar; D Niemeyer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-09-26       Impact factor: 56.272

  2 in total
  10 in total

1.  Trends in adult cigarette smoking in California compared with the rest of the United States, 1978-1994.

Authors:  M Siegel; P D Mowery; T P Pechacek; W J Strauss; M W Schooley; R K Merritt; T E Novotny; G A Giovino; M P Eriksen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Effectiveness of comprehensive tobacco control programmes in reducing teenage smoking in the USA.

Authors:  M Wakefield; F Chaloupka
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Prevalence of hardcore smoking in England, and associated attitudes and beliefs: cross sectional study.

Authors:  Martin J Jarvis; Jane Wardle; Jo Waller; Lesley Owen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-05-17

4.  Chronic disease control in public health practice: looking back and moving forward.

Authors:  Ross C Brownson; Frank S Bright
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Is acculturation a risk factor for early smoking initiation among Chinese American minors? A comparative perspective.

Authors:  X Chen; J B Unger; C A Johnson
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  Independent evaluation of the California Tobacco Control Program: relationships between program exposure and outcomes, 1996-1998.

Authors:  Louise Ann Rohrbach; Beth Howard-Pitney; Jennifer B Unger; Clyde W Dent; Kim Ammann Howard; Tess Boley Cruz; Kurt M Ribisl; Gregory J Norman; Howard Fishbein; C Anderson Johnson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  A three-decade evolution to transdisciplinary research: community health research in California-Mexico border communities.

Authors:  John P Elder; Guadalupe X Ayala; Thomas L McKenzie; Alan J Litrownik; Linda C Gallo; Elva M Arredondo; Gregory A Talavera; Robert M Kaplan
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2014

8.  An evaluation of the California community intervention.

Authors:  Mary V Modayil; David W Cowling; Hao Tang; April Roeseler
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 9.  Mass media interventions for smoking cessation in adults.

Authors:  Malgorzata M Bala; Lukasz Strzeszynski; Roman Topor-Madry
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-21

Review 10.  Mass media interventions for preventing smoking in young people.

Authors:  Kristin V Carson; Faisal Ameer; Kourosh Sayehmiri; Khin Hnin; Joseph Em van Agteren; Fatemeh Sayehmiri; Malcolm P Brinn; Adrian J Esterman; Anne B Chang; Brian J Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.