Literature DB >> 8711102

Lead testing of children and homes: results of a national telephone survey.

S Binder1, T D Matte, M Kresnow, B Houston, J J Sacks.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to estimate the percentage of young children in the United States who have been tested for lead and the percentage of dwellings in the United States in which the paint has been tested for lead.
METHODS: A national random digit dial telephone survey of 5238 households was conducted in 1994. Weighted national estimates and 95% confidence intervals for outcomes of interest were calculated.
RESULTS: About 24% of U.S. children ages 0 to 6 years were estimated to have been tested for lead. Higher rates of testing were reported for children living in homes constructed prior to 1960, those living in homes with low household income, those living in rental units, and those living in the Northeast. Lead paint testing was performed for only an estimated 9% of U.S. housing units. Older homes were not more likely to have been tested than newer ones.
CONCLUSION: A high proportion of pre-school children have apparently not been screened for lead exposure, even among subgroups at increased risk. Most dwellings of pre-school children have not been tested for lead paint. These data suggest that most at-risk children are not being reached by current approaches to lead poisoning prevention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8711102      PMCID: PMC1381879     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  3 in total

1.  Backing off universal childhood lead screening in the USA: opportunity or pitfall?

Authors:  M Diermayer; K Hedberg; D Fleming
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-12-10       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Lead poisoning among low-income children in Orange County, California. A need for regionally differentiated policy.

Authors:  G A Gellert; G A Wagner; R M Maxwell; D Moore; L Foster
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-07-07       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Blood lead levels in the US population. Phase 1 of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III, 1988 to 1991)

Authors:  D J Brody; J L Pirkle; R A Kramer; K M Flegal; T D Matte; E W Gunter; D C Paschal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-07-27       Impact factor: 56.272

  3 in total
  5 in total

1.  Clinician follow-up of children screened for lead poisoning.

Authors:  M Markowitz; J F Rosen; I Clemente
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Residential smoke alarms and fire escape plans.

Authors:  P A Harvey; J J Sacks; G W Ryan; P F Bender
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  CDC's lead screening guidance: a systematic approach to more effective screening.

Authors:  N M Tips; H Falk; R J Jackson
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  Nonfatal physical violence, United States, 1994.

Authors:  L B Potter; J J Sacks; M J Kresnow; J Mercy
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Should the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's childhood lead poisoning intervention level be lowered?

Authors:  Susan M Bernard
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.308

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.