Literature DB >> 8709780

Bleeding complications of oral anticoagulant treatment: an inception-cohort, prospective collaborative study (ISCOAT). Italian Study on Complications of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy.

G Palareti1, N Leali, S Coccheri, M Poggi, C Manotti, A D'Angelo, V Pengo, N Erba, M Moia, N Ciavarella, G Devoto, M Berrettini, S Musolesi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bleeding is the most serious complication of the use of oral anticoagulation in the prevention and treatment of thromoboembolic complications. We studied the frequency of bleeding complications in outpatients treated routinely in anticoagulation clinics.
METHODS: In a prospective cohort from thirty-four Italian anticoagulation clinics, 2745 consecutive patients were studied from the start of their oral anticoagulation (warfarin in 64%, acenocourmarol in the rest). The target anticoagulation-intensity was low (international normalised ratio [INR] < or = 2.8) in 71% of the patients and high (> 2.8) in the remainder. We recorded demographic details and the main indication for treatment and, every 3-4 months, INR and outcome events. Such events included all complications (bleeding, thrombosis, other), although only bleeding events are reported here, and deaths. We divided bleeding into major and minor categories.
FINDINGS: 43% of the patients were women. Nearly three-fifths of the patients were aged 60-79; 8% were over 80. The main indication for treatment was venous thrombolism (33%), followed by non-ischaemic heart disease (17%). Mean follow-up was 267 days. Over 2011 patient-years of follow-up, 153 bleeding complications occurred (7.6 per 100 patient-years). 5 were fatal (all cerebral haemorrhages, 0.25 per 100 patient-years), 23 were major (1.1), and 125 were minor (6.2). The rate of events was similar between sexes, coumarin type, size of enrolling centre, and target INR. The rate was higher in older patients: 10.5 per 100 patient-years in those aged 70 or over, 6.0 in those aged under 70 (relative risk 1.75, 95% Cl 1.29-2.39, p < 0.001). The rate was also higher when the indication was peripheral and/or cerebrovascular disease than venous thromboembolism plus other indications (12.5 vs 6.0 per 100 patient-years) (1.80, 1.2-2.7, p < 0.01), and during the first 90 days of treatment compared with later (11.0 vs 6.3, 1.75, 1.27-2.44, p < 0.001). A fifth of the bleeding events occurred at low anticoagulation intensity (INR < 2, rate 7.7 per 100 patient-years of follow-up). The rates were 4.8, 9.5, 40.5, and 200 at INRs 2.0-2.9, 3-4.4, 4.5-6.9, and over 7, respectively (relative risks for INR > 4.5, 7.91, 5.44-11.5, p < 0.0001).
INTERPRETATION: We saw fewer bleeding events than those recorded in other observational and experimental studies. Oral anticoagulation has become safer in recent years, especially if monitored in anticoagulation clinics. Caution is required in elderly patients and anticoagulation intensity should be closely monitored to reduce periods of overdosing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8709780     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)01109-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  240 in total

Review 1.  Out-of-hospital coagulation monitoring and management.

Authors:  J E Ansell
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 2.  Risk of post-discharge venous thromboembolism in patients with rheumatoid arthritis undergoing knee or hip arthroplasty. Is prolonged thromboprophylaxis warranted or dangerous?

Authors:  M T Nurmohamed; W F Lems; B A Dijkmans
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Anticoagulation Management as a Risk Factor for Adverse Events: Grounds for Improvement.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Thrombophilia testing: what do we think the tests mean and what should we do with the results?

Authors:  T Baglin
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Development of a decision aid for atrial fibrillation who are considering antithrombotic therapy.

Authors:  M Man-Son-Hing; A Laupacis; A M O'Connor; R G Hart; G Feldman; J L Blackshear; D C Anderson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Prevention of post-discharge venous thromboembolism in patients with rheumatoid arthritis undergoing knee or hip arthroplasty: a continuing matter of debate.

Authors:  M T Nurmohamed; B A Dijkmans; B A Dijkmans
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 7.  Suprachoroidal haemorrhage after addition of clarithromycin to warfarin.

Authors:  S S Dandekar; D A Laidlaw
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 8.  Anticoagulation in patients with thromboembolic disease.

Authors:  R C Tait
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 9.  Use of oral anticoagulants in older patients.

Authors:  J L Sebastian; D D Tresch
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 10.  Management of bleeding in patients receiving conventional or new anticoagulants: a practical and case-based approach.

Authors:  Marco P Donadini; Walter Ageno; James D Douketis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.