Literature DB >> 8708686

Defective imitation of gestures in patients with damage in the left or right hemispheres.

G Goldenberg1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Defective imitation of meaningless gestures has repeatedly been demonstrated in patients with apraxia and has been interpreted as being due to a deficit of motor execution. There is, however, controversy as to whether some impairment of imitation also occurs in patients with right brain damage. The aim was to compare defective imitation in patients with left and right brain damage and to explore whether there are qualitative differences between them.
METHODS: Imitation was examined in 80 patients with left brain damage (LBD) and aphasia, 40 patients with right brain damage (RBD), and 60 controls for three types of gestures:hand positions, finger configurations, and combined gestures which required a defined hand position as well as a defined configuration of the fingers.
RESULTS: Regardless of whether imitation of hand positions and finger configurations were tested each on their own or together, they showed differential susceptibility to RBD and LBD. Whereas imitation of finger configurations was about equally impaired in RBD and LBD, defective imitation of hand positions occurred almost exclusively in patients with LBD, and whereas controls as well as patients with RBD committed less errors with hand positions than with finger configurations, the reverse was the case in patients with LBD.
CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of results goes against a deficit of motor execution as being the cause of defective imitation in patients with LBD, as it is difficult to see why such a deficit should affect proximal movements necessary for reaching hand positions more than differential finger movements. An alternative explanation would be that in patients with LBD errors are due to defective mediation by knowledge about the human body whereas in patients with RBD they stem from faulty visuospatial analysis of the demonstrated gesture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8708686      PMCID: PMC1073992          DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.61.2.176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  10 in total

1.  Analysis of task demands in apraxia.

Authors:  E A Roy; P Square-Storer; S Hogg; S Adams
Journal:  Int J Neurosci       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.292

2.  Motor functions of the left hemisphere.

Authors:  D Kimura; Y Archibald
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  The influence of the hemispheric side of lesion on non verbal tasks of finger localization.

Authors:  G Gainotti; C Cianchetti; C Tiacci
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1972-12       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Localization of body parts in brain injured subjects.

Authors:  C Semenza; H Goodglass
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Imitating gestures. A quantitative approach to ideomotor apraxia.

Authors:  E De Renzi; F Motti; P Nichelli
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1980-01

Review 6.  Ideomotor apraxia and cerebral dominance for motor control.

Authors:  G Goldenberg; J Hermsdörfer; J Spatt
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  1996-03

7.  Multiple representations contribute to body knowledge processing. Evidence from a case of autotopagnosia.

Authors:  A Sirigu; J Grafman; K Bressler; T Sunderland
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Ideomotor apraxia and aphasia: an examination of types and manifestations of apraxic symptoms.

Authors:  G Lehmkuhl; K Poeck; K Willmes
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  The executive and ideational components of apraxia.

Authors:  C Barbieri; E De Renzi
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  Imitating gestures and manipulating a mannikin--the representation of the human body in ideomotor apraxia.

Authors:  G Goldenberg
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.139

  10 in total
  38 in total

1.  Apraxia impairs intentional retrieval of incidentally acquired motor knowledge.

Authors:  Anna Dovern; Gereon R Fink; Jochen Saliger; Hans Karbe; Iring Koch; Peter H Weiss
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  When objects lose their meaning: what happens to their use?

Authors:  Sasha Bozeat; Matthew A Lambon Ralph; Karalyn Patterson; John R Hodges
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Imaging a cognitive model of apraxia: the neural substrate of gesture-specific cognitive processes.

Authors:  Philippe Peigneux; Martial Van der Linden; Gaetan Garraux; Steven Laureys; Christian Degueldre; Joel Aerts; Guy Del Fiore; Gustave Moonen; Andre Luxen; Eric Salmon
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  [Structural and functional neuroimaging of the pathophysiology of apraxia].

Authors:  P H Weiss; G R Fink
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 5.  [Apraxias].

Authors:  F Binkofski; G Fink
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.214

6.  Processing the spatial configuration of complex actions involves right posterior parietal cortex: An fMRI study with clinical implications.

Authors:  Peter H Weiss; Nuh N Rahbari; Silke Lux; Uwe Pietrzyk; Johannes Noth; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Neuropsychological perspectives on the mechanisms of imitation.

Authors:  Raffaella I Rumiati; Joana C Carmo; Corrado Corradi-Dell'Acqua
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Functional connectivity associated with hand shape generation: Imitating novel hand postures and pantomiming tool grips challenge different nodes of a shared neural network.

Authors:  Guy Vingerhoets; Amanda Clauwaert
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  The head bone's connected to the neck bone: when do toddlers represent their own body topography?

Authors:  Celia A Brownell; Sara R Nichols; Margarita Svetlova; Stephanie Zerwas; Geetha Ramani
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2010 May-Jun

10.  Tool use without a tool: kinematic characteristics of pantomiming as compared to actual use and the effect of brain damage.

Authors:  Joachim Hermsdörfer; Yong Li; Jennifer Randerath; Georg Goldenberg; Leif Johannsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.