Literature DB >> 8708301

Variability in mammography use among older women.

R B Burns1, E P McCarthy, K M Freund, S L Marwill, M Shwartz, A Ash, M A Moskowitz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine rates of and explore factors associated with mammography use among older women.
DESIGN: Retrospective review of part B (physician) bills submitted to Medicare during 1990.
SETTING: Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) data, including sociodemographic information and part B physician bills for all services delivered to Medicare-eligible women in 1990. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Women age 65 or older as of January 1, 1990, residing in one of 10 states with part B coverage through December 31, 1990.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The outcome was receipt of a mammogram (yes/no). We explored factors associated with mammography use within three age groups: 65 to 74, 75 to 84, and 85+. The factors considered were race, state, median income of ZIP Code of residence (from the 1990 US Census, and used to divide the population into quintiles within each state), and number of primary care visits (0, 1, 2, and 3+). Overall, 15% of women had a mammogram: 20% of women age 65 to 74, 12% of women age 75 to 84, and 4% of women age 85 and older. Mammography use was lowest in Oklahoma and highest in Washington. However, in each state the older the age category, the less the mammography use (e.g., 9% vs 5% vs 2% in Oklahoma and 25% vs 16% vs 5% in Washington for women 65-74, 75-84, and 85+, respectively). Mammography use was lower for black than for white women age 65 to 74 (14% vs 21%, P < .001) and 75 to 84 (9% vs 12%, P < .001). Women in each of these two age groups had lower mammography use if they resided in the lowest income quintile and highest if they resided in the highest income quintile (17% vs 23% 65-74, and 10% vs 13% 75-84, P values < .001). Among the oldest women (those 85+), mammography use was low (4%) and varied minimally by race and income (P = .907 and .003, respectively). In all age groups, mammography use was lowest among women who did not have a primary care visit, was greater among women who had at least one visit, and continued to rise with increasing numbers of visits (all P values < .001). For example, among women age 75 to 84, mammography use increased from 5% to 10%, 14%, and 17% for those with 0, 1, 2, and 3+ visits.
CONCLUSIONS: We found that mammography use was less for women who were older, of black race, who did not visit a primary care provider, and who lived in areas with lower median income and certain geographic locations (states). Similar factors influenced mammography use in women age 65 to 74, where there is greater consensus as to who should receive a mammogram, and women age 75 to 84, where there is neither consensus nor data. Surprisingly, neither race nor income had much influence on mammography use among women age 85 or older.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8708301     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb01861.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  16 in total

1.  Racial trends in age-specific breast cancer mortality rates in US women.

Authors:  A M Marbella; P M Layde
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Outcomes of the Learn, Share & Live breast cancer education program for older urban women.

Authors:  C S Skinner; C L Arfken; B Waterman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  A comparison of the preventive health care provided by women's health centers and general internal medicine practices.

Authors:  L H Harpole; E A Mort; K M Freund; J Orav; T A Brennan
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  The influence of type and severity of mental illness on receipt of screening mammography.

Authors:  Caroline P Carney; Laura E Jones
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Relationship between earlier and later mammography screening--California Medicare, 1992 through 1994.

Authors:  J D Parker; F Sabogal; T Gebretsadik
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1999-01

6.  Variation in cardiologists' propensity to test and treat: is it associated with regional variation in utilization?

Authors:  Frances Lee Lucas; Brenda E Sirovich; Patricia M Gallagher; Andrea E Siewers; David E Wennberg
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2010-04-13

7.  Mammography FastTrack: an intervention to facilitate reminders for breast cancer screening across a heterogeneous multi-clinic primary care network.

Authors:  William T Lester; Jeffrey M Ashburner; Richard W Grant; Henry C Chueh; Michael J Barry; Steven J Atlas
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Preventive health care among older women: missed opportunities and poor targeting.

Authors:  Mara A Schonberg; Suzanne G Leveille; Edward R Marcantonio
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Refining physician quality indicators for screening mammography in older women: distinguishing appropriate use from overuse.

Authors:  Alai Tan; Yong-Fang Kuo; Linda S Elting; James S Goodwin
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 10.  A review of geographic variation and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) applications in prescription drug use research.

Authors:  Victoria Wangia; Theresa I Shireman
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2013-01-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.